Categories: Featured Articles » Interesting Facts
Number of views: 81420
Comments on the article: 14

Why the frequency standard of 50 hertz is chosen in the electric power industry

 

Why to this day in the energy industry for the transmission and distribution of electricity everywhere have frequencies of 50 and 60 Hz been selected and remain accepted? Have you ever thought about this? But this is not at all accidental.

Frequency 50 Hz

In the countries of Europe and the CIS, the standard 220-240 volts of 50 hertz is adopted, in the North American countries and in the USA - 110-120 volts of 60 Hz, and in Brazil 120, 127 and 220 volts of 60 Hz. By the way, directly in the USA in the outlet sometimes it can turn out, say, 57 or 54 Hz. Where do these numbers come from?

Let's turn to the story to understand this topic. In the second half of the 19th century, scientists from many countries of the world actively studied electricity and looked for practical applications for it. Thomas Edison invented his first light bulb, thereby introducing electric lighting. The first DC power plants were built. The beginning of electrification in the USA.

Why the frequency standard of 50 hertz is chosen in the electric power industry

The first lamps were arc, they glowed with an electric discharge burning in the open air, ignited between two carbon electrodes. The experimenters of that time quickly found that it was at 45 volts that the arc became more stable, however, for safe ignition, a resistive ballast was connected in series with the lamp, on which about 20 volts fell during the operation of the lamp.

So, for a long time, a constant voltage of 65 volts was applied. Then it was increased to 110 volts, so that two arc lamps could be connected to the network simultaneously.

Thomas Edison

Edison was a fanatical supporter of DC systems, and Edison's DC generators initially worked like that, supplying 110 volts DC to consumer networks.

But Edison’s DC technology was very, very costly, economically unprofitable: it was necessary to lay a lot of thick wires, and the transmission from the power plant to the consumer did not exceed a distance of several hundred meters, since transmission losses were enormous.

Later, a three-wire 220-volt DC system was introduced (two parallel lines of 110 volts each), but the situation regarding the efficiency of such a transmission did not improve significantly.

Nikola Tesla

Later Nikola Tesla He developed his own, completely innovative alternators, and introduced a cost-effective system for transmitting electricity at high voltages of several thousand volts, and electricity could be transmitted thousands of meters, transmission losses decreased by tens of times. Edison's direct current could not stand the competition with Tesla's alternating current.

Transformers on iron lowered the high voltage to 127 volts in each of the three phases, supplying it to the consumer in the form of alternating current. During operation of alternators, driven by steam or falling water, their rotors rotated with a frequency of 3000 rpm and even more.

This allowed the lamps to not flicker, asynchronous motors to operate normally, withstanding rated speeds, and transformers to convert electricity, increase and decrease voltage.

Generator Dolivo-Dobrovolsky

Meanwhile, in the USSR, the voltage of the networks until the 60s remained at the level of 127 volts, then with the growth of production capacities it was raised to 220 volts that we are now familiar with.

Dolivo-Dobrovolsky, like Tesla, who studied the possibilities of alternating current, suggested using a sinusoidal current for electric power transmission, and suggested setting the frequency in the range from 30 to 40 hertz. Later they converged on 50 hertz in the USSR and on 60 hertz in the USA. These frequencies were optimal for AC equipment, which worked in many factories.

Modern alternator

The rotation frequency of a bipolar alternator is 3,000 or a maximum of 3,600 rpm, and it gives just the frequencies of 50 and 60 Hz during generation. For normal operation of the alternator, the frequency should be at least 50-60 Hz. Industrial transformers easily convert alternating current of a given frequency.

Today, in principle, it is possible to increase the frequency of electric power transmission to many kilohertz, and thus save on materials of conductors in power transmission lines, however, the infrastructure remains adapted specifically for a current frequency of 50 Hz, it was so designed initially around the world, generators in nuclear power plants rotate with the same at a speed of 3000 rpm, they still have the same pair of poles. Therefore, the modification of power generation, transmission and distribution systems is a matter of the distant future. That is why 220 volts of 50 hertz remain our standard so far.

See also at i.electricianexp.com:

  • Why in different countries the voltage and frequency in the electric s ...
  • Which current is more dangerous, direct or alternating?
  • How to distinguish an induction motor from a DC motor
  • What is a dynamo machine. The first DC generators
  • How to determine the rotation speed of an electric motor

  •  
     
    Comments:

    # 1 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Good afternoon.
    Thank you for the article. I was interested in this question, and today I received an exhaustive answer.
    But there are a couple of questions:
    How laborious is frequency transformation?
    Why "worldwide" if European and American standards are different?
    And lastly, there are a lot of power supplies at 50/60 Hz. Which electrical appliance cannot yet have double standards?

     
    Comments:

    # 2 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    In principle, everything is correct, but if we take into account the fact that it is not economically feasible to transmit alternating current of increased frequency over long distances due to losses caused by the capacitive component of power lines, this would be a more plausible explanation. Lowering the frequency again entails significant costs associated with an increase in size, and of course material costs in the manufacture of equipment.

     
    Comments:

    # 3 wrote: a guest | [quote]

     
     

    Everything from the fact that it was not possible to raise the voltage to transmit power over distances - transformers operate on alternating current. At that time it was the only right decision ..

     
    Comments:

    # 4 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    As for Dolivo-Dobrovolsky --- this "engineer-innovator" worked for Edison, who stole (did not pay) Tesla's patents for part of the equipment of a two-phase AC system .... while Tesla himself threatened this with a serious court ... Edison seeing how the money floated away to the Westinghouse company (improvement work continued), didn’t come up with anything better and patented a three-phase current system ..... with the most primitive modifications of the two-phase system .. Dolivo-Dobrovolsky performed the modification work, which cost everything exactly 30% for consumables, and there’s absolutely no benefit except for the extra wire and design complexity. This was done in Europe, where there were few DC lines for two wires, unlike America, where they were already everywhere and Tesla was developing a two-phase system with ground only for the purpose of their use ..

     
    Comments:

    # 5 wrote: Alex gal | [quote]

     
     

    "For normal operation of the alternator, the frequency must be at least 50-60 Hz"

    Why is this so? The generator does not care what frequency it will give out.

    The article says a lot correctly, in full clarity there is no why 50Hz is used.

    But in fact, everything is very simple, but the article does not say so. In fact, steam engines cannot operate at a speed of 3000 rpm, a maximum of 100-200 rpm. At such a frequency, the first of them worked, increasing the speed with belt reducers. You won’t raise much there.And since the AC frequency directly depends on the number of revolutions f = n / 60 for one pair of poles, while it was technically difficult to obtain high revolutions, therefore, the frequency was chosen as low as possible. And since 3000 rpm was not achievable, they increased the number of pairs of generator poles. Such a generator, for example, with 8 poles was built back in 1878. He gave out 40Hz from a steam engine; for this, he spins up to 600 revolutions through a belt reducer.

    That is, this is an example of the difficulty of obtaining a high frequency supply voltage. Now why not 30, not 40, but 50 or 60Hz.

    Everything is simple. You are right that the first consumers for these generators were light bulbs. The proposed frequency of 30-40Hz caused unpleasant and noticeable pulsations of lighting. At 50 Hz, the pulsations were already barely noticeable, above - there were difficulties with increasing the speed of the generator shaft or with the technical design of the generator winding (the number of its poles). Something like that.

     
    Comments:

    # 6 wrote: Maksim | [quote]

     
     

    Increasing the frequency leads to an increase in losses in capacitance and inductance + radio emission. Just on the line of the direct current, minimum losses. Kilohertz drive oh I doubt how it will squeak on it will be already 110kV interesting.

     
    Comments:

    # 7 wrote: Jnsx | [quote]

     
     

    But ideally for the eyes, a better frequency is 100Hz? Or am I wrong comparing the frequency of flickering light with the frequency of the monitor. But if a light bulb at 50Hz flickers a little, does it mean that at 60 it flickers less and at 100Hz there will be a nice clean even light? And the whole problem is the cost?

     
    Comments:

    # 8 wrote: Kitaro | [quote]

     
     

    As usual, everyone is misled. See how the chargers operating at higher frequencies have decreased. Power supplies, inverters and other devices are reduced by increasing the frequency of the mains. Not only that, at certain frequencies, a person does not feel the passage of current through his body. You can tell a lot more about the possibilities of increased frequencies ...

     
    Comments:

    # 9 wrote: Konoplyov | [quote]

     
     

    Decentralization and autonomy of energy generation at the cluster level of 20-200m will save the world economy and, consequently, civilization. At the same time, a 5 kW generator should not be more expensive than a simple mobile phone with buttons, the exception is the industrial consumer.

     
    Comments:

    # 10 wrote: Ratibor | [quote]

     
     

    Article from the evil one. Just admit that the high frequency is not beneficial for the bourgeois capitalists, since the losses in the networks will disappear, people will not be shocked and there will be no need to build nuclear power plants and thermal power plants, as well as pay for the light. And 50 Hz is very harmful to the human brain, it is a fact. People should bathe in energy and live richly, but the servants of java do not allow this.

     
    Comments:

    # 11 wrote: Konstantin | [quote]

     
     

    The article is about nothing, the main idea: well, it happened. All the main information is in the comments (((
    I will add one more: in planes, an increased frequency of the internal network = 400 Hz is used, advantage: compact equipment. Many devices still need a constant current, and much less capacitors are needed to rectify 400Hz than to rectify 50 / 60Hz

     
    Comments:

    # 12 wrote: Serzhik | [quote]

     
     

    Do not compare consumer equipment (charging) and transmission lines. To transmit such a high-frequency (hundreds of kilohertz) voltage over the wires without any enormous losses will not succeed.

     
    Comments:

    # 13 wrote: Paul | [quote]

     
     

    The frequency of 50 Hz in household electrical networks was chosen, probably due to the fact that incandescent lamps were used everywhere, and their thermal inertia allows the frequency to be applied up to about 25 Hz (at a lower frequency, light pulsation becomes noticeable). This is the lower threshold. Well, the top one is related to the technical capabilities of the generators.

     
    Comments:

    # 14 wrote: Anonymous | [quote]

     
     

    In fact, a three-phase system allows you to organize a simple and efficient electric drive, in contrast to a single-phase (not two-phase!), Requiring phase-shifting capacitors and having a low efficiency.

    In aviation, a frequency of 400 Hz is used due to the presence of specific consumers - horizons and gyro-verticals, the flywheels of which must rotate at a high frequency, which is provided by asynchronous electric motors powered from such a network.