Categories: Electrician at home, Safety precautions
Number of views: 51473
Comments on the article: 10

Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 2

 

Begin the article here - Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 1.

Electrically safe private house and cottageSystem TN - C - S. In the final version, we have the following scheme - see. fig. 11 and fig. 12. The diagram shows the minimum necessary kit to protect your home. The ILV relay will protect your home from overvoltage and undervoltage at the input. And if you can’t protect yourself from the increased voltage (breaking the PEN wire is unlikely), but what the hell doesn’t joke, and the lower voltage can always take place, which is extremely dangerous for electric motors. In addition, if you have an UZO electronic, then with a reduced voltage or a broken only neutral wire, it may simply not work and leave the house without protection.

The RCD will protect you from direct contact with the phase wire, from leakage currents that can cause a fire, and also instantly turn off the faulty power plant (when the phase closes to its case). The circuit breaker will monitor short-circuit currents and overload in the network.


Regarding the re-grounding of the PEN wire ....

According to the PUE, clause 1.7.61 "... Re-grounding of electrical installations with voltages up to 1 kV, powered by overhead lines, MUST be performed in accordance with clause 1.7.102-1.7.103." According to p.1.7.102 "... and also on the overhead line inputs to electrical installations in which automatic power off is used as a protective measure for indirect contact, repeated grounding of the PEN conductor MUST be performed."

Thus, the PUE obliges us to re-ground the PEN - wires at the entrance to the house with the TN-C-S system. According to paragraph 1.7.103, the resistance of re-grounding in our case should be no more than 30th. Keep in mind that this resistance is measured when the PEN wire is disconnected (that is, without taking into account all the repeated grounding external to your house - repeated grounding on the overhead line). If you then connect the PEN wire from the overhead line again to your repeated grounding, then the total resistance should be no more than 10 Ohms (see clause 1.7.103).

Since we cannot be sure that all re-groundings are made on the overhead line, it may turn out that our re-grounding is the only one on the overhead line, that is, it must be less than 10 Ohms. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately focus on the value of not more than 10 Ohms in ordinary soil (in sandy, not more than 50 ohms) when installing your grounding device. Representatives of gas companies also require this, if you have a gas boiler.

TN-C-S system

Fig. 11. System TN-C-S (click on the picture to enlarge)

TN-C-S system according to PUE 7.1.22

Fig. 12. System TN-C-S according to PUE 7.1.22 (click on the picture to enlarge)


Now let's deal with the choice of circuit breakers.

First you need to understand that the circuit breaker that protects your sockets should not be higher than 16A, and the one that protects the lamps should not be higher than 10A. Why? The fact is that all the electrical appliances that you use in the house are connected to sockets with a cord, and this cord, according to the norms, should not be a cross section of less than 0.75 sq. Mm in copper. The rated current for this section is 16A.

If you set the circuit breaker to 25A, then it will start to "do something" only at a current of more than 25A and if 25A current flows through the cord rated for 16A, this will cause it to heat up, melt the insulation and ultimately to the current Short circuit in the cord and the fire in the house. Similarly with luminaires, as according to the norms, all internal connections in them must be made with a copper wire with a cross section of at least 0.5 sq. Mm. For such a cross section, the rated current is 10A.


Well, remember. The circuit breaker no more than 16A protects sockets, and at 10A - lamps. Move on. It must be remembered that circuit breakers are of type B, C, D. We are only interested in type B and C. What is it?

Type B is a circuit breaker that disables the electrical installation within 3 -5 1nom. Accordingly, type C is within 5-10 1nom. For what specific time the machine will work, look at its protective characteristics. But we are not designers, so we’ll do it easier and better in terms of electrical safety.

According to GOST, according to which all these machines are manufactured, its response time at the upper limit (for type B is 5 Inom, and for type C it’s 10 Inom) must be no more than 0.1 sec. And according to table 1.7.1 of the PUE, the time for switching off the machine at 220V should be no more than 0.4 sec. What is it for? Scientific studies have found that the severity of electric shock affects both the magnitude of the voltage and the time during which it acts on the person. If a person, for example, touched open conductive parts (HRE), on which the phase (220V) suddenly “sat down”, then it is believed that a person should not be energized for more than 0.4 sec (for 220V), that is, it will be for him safely. Remember - I wrote above that I will tell you how to get rid of the stress of touch - this is exactly the way.

So, we will not consider the protective characteristics of machines. The fact that a type B machine with a short-circuit current of 5 Inom. (A machine of type C for 10 1nom.) instantly (for 0.1sec) disconnect the voltage, we are quite happy. We will focus on this.

Move on. It turns out that for the instantaneous operation of an automatic machine of type B at 16 amperes, a current equal to 5x16 = 80 A is needed, and for type C a current of 10x16 = 160 A is needed. And what section of wires is needed to guarantee such a current? Let's count a little.

R = U / 1 = 220/80 = 2.8 Ohms

S = 0.0175xL / S sq. Mm

Suppose, for example, this machine protects the wiring to an outlet installed at a distance of 100 meters. Then S = 1.25 sq. Mm. According to the PUE, the minimum cross-section of copper wires should be at least 1.5 sq. Mm according to the conditions of mechanical strength. Therefore, making the wiring to our outlet a copper wire with a cross-section of 1.5 sq. Mm, we will fulfill the requirements of the PUE and reliably protect everything that is in the protection zone of this machine.

Now take a 16 A machine, but type C, and do similar calculations. We see that in the case of a type B machine, the wiring to the outlet is at a distance of 100 m can be made a wire with a cross-section of 1.5 square mm, and for a type C machine, a wire with a cross-section of 2.5 sq. mm in copper. What is best for your home - I think you can figure it out yourself. The main thing is that you already understand the essence of the problem.


Now let's talk about choosing an RCD.

As a rule, we are not rich people and buy UZO so-called "electronic", that is, if power is supplied to it (in this case, from the 220V network itself), then it works and protects our house and person. And if, for example, there is a break in the neutral wire to the RCD itself, then the phase will go into the house, and the RCD will be inoperative with all the ensuing consequences. Therefore, I highly recommend installing an ILV relay that will track this and other troubles. If possible, instead of a combined RCD (RCD plus an automatic machine in one housing), it is better to choose a separate RCD and an automatic machine, since when a combined RCD is tripped, it is impossible to understand why it worked - from overload, short-circuit current, leakage current, phase closure to the HRE or HFC housing. With a separate machine and RCD - everything becomes immediately clear. RCD at rated current should be selected one step above the machine that stands in front of it

Since we are considering an ordinary residential building, and not a huge mansion, then the RCD at the entrance to the house must be taken at 20 or more amperes and a differential current of 30 Ma, that’s enough to protect your home. It is better to take an input circuit breaker than one-pole, but two-pole for the TT system and three-pole for the system TN-C-S (PUE 1.7.145).

TT system

Fig. 13. TT system (click on the picture to enlarge)

If you carefully read everything written above, then you can easily figure out the TT system as well. Its differences from the TN-C-S system are that the PEN wire is not separated at the input to PE and N conductors.The PEN conductor now plays the role of only the N conductor (working zero) and therefore is immediately connected to the electric meter.

We must do the PE conductor ourselves by performing the EARTHING DEVICE on the site and connecting the RE-bus of the input shield to it. From this backplane bus we will take PE conductors to sockets and where necessary, as in the TN-C-S system. But in the TT system there is one problem - it is impossible to create large currents for the operation of automatic machines in it. It is one thing to close the phase and neutral wires between each other, and it is quite another to stick the phase into the ground. Even if we make a grounding device with a resistance of 10 ohms, we get a current of 220/10 = 22 A - a meager current for the operation of the machines, so that they are now no help to us. What to do?

Here the UZO at 30mA (0.03A) comes to the rescue. Such an RCD will work with a current to earth of only 0.03A, that is, just what we need. The requirements for grounding resistance in the TT system are less stringent than in the TN-C-S system. What does it mean less stringent? Let's figure it out.

According to PUE 1.7.59 in the TT system, the grounding resistance should be R s <50 / Id-R zp, where 50 is the largest contact voltage on the HRE and the HF Id -dif. RCD current R zp is the resistance of the grounding conductor Since the distances in our residential building are small, we can take Rzp = 0 Then R z <50 / Id

In a private house there are a lot of especially dangerous places - a street, sheds and so on, therefore we will not save on electrical safety and will accept instead of 50 volts 12 volts. From 12 volts certainly will not kill. Then Rz = 12 / 1.4xId = 12 / 1.4x0.03 = 286 Ohms, that is, the ground resistance should be at least 286 Ohms.

The draft new revision of the MES 60364-4-41 standard sets the maximum values ​​for the response time of automatic power off in the TT system. This is 0.2 seconds at 120-230 volts and 0.07 seconds at a voltage of 230-400 volts. RCDs of type A and AC are triggered during the indicated time when sinusoidal earth fault currents appear (1z) Iz = 2 Id (for voltage 120-230) Iz = 5 Id (for voltage 230-400 volts).

With pulsating earth fault currents, a Type A RCD trips for the indicated time when the fault current is equal to: Iz = 1.4x2 Id (at a voltage of 120-230 volts) Iz = 1.4x5 Id (at a voltage of 230-400 volts). The maximum resistance value under the most adverse conditions will be: 12 / 1.4x5x0.03 = 57 Ohms. This is the resistance of the grounding device and you need to navigate. However, according to circular No. 31.2012 “On the implementation of re-grounding and automatic power off at the input of individual construction objects”, the resistance of re-grounding should be no more than 30 Ohms. With a specific soil resistance of more than 300 Ohm x m, an increase in resistance of up to 150 Ohm is allowed.


Entrance to the building power supply

Now let's dwell in more detail on how to correctly perform input from the overhead line to the house. Most residential buildings do not require a load current of more than 25 A (this is approximately 10 kW of power). Then we turn directly to clause 7.1.22 of the PUE, which indicates in detail how to enter in this case. All the requirements of this paragraph (and of course other PUE standards) I have depicted in Fig. 14.

Input from overhead lines with rated current up to 25 A. According to PUE 7.1.22.

Fig. 14. Input from overhead lines with rated current up to 25 A. According to PUE 7.1.22. (click on the picture to enlarge)

All the necessary explanations are given directly in the figure, so I will point out the most common errors with the input device. The most dangerous mistake is not to protect the wiring with the pipe to the shield itself. This is not done all the time, and therefore any short circuit in this section of the wiring, which also has no protection, leads to spraying of hot metal, and the fire in the house is almost guaranteed. And even if the wiring is made in a pipe, then not every pipe will pass such a test. Therefore, the metal pipe should be with a wall thickness of at least 3.2 mm (for our case).

Another, but not so obvious mistake - this is very often done by SIP input directly into the house to the shield, without cutting it at the insulators. Of course, this method has its advantages, but if the input wires to the house are not made of COPPER, NOT FLEXIBLE, not INSULATED wire, in NON-COMBUSIBLE INSULATION, not with LIGHT-stabilized properties, then we do not fulfill the requirements of the PUE. What can I say?

In this example, the branch and entry into the house are performed by SIP sec. 16 sq. Mm. With such a cross-section and a load in the house with a current of less than 25 A, the copper wire or aluminum is hardly significant. The fact that SIP is flexible does not seem to be in doubt either, and even with such a cross section.The fact that SIP 4 is made with insulation with light stabilized properties \, the same is clear. There is only one indicator that remains - insulation must be non-combustible, and this is the most serious argument. Even if you protect the wiring with a pipe, this is not a way out, since the fire is very insidious.

Now SIP5 ng has appeared on sale - that is, in non-combustible isolation. Then we can talk about direct entry of self-supporting insulated wires into the house, though we still formally violate the PUE. The conclusion from all this is obvious - there is no need to take risks, everything must be done according to the rules of the PUE. And if you prefer SIP, then do its cutting at the entrance to the house, and then enter the house itself and make a COPPER FLEXIBLE CABLE section. not less than 4 sq. mm in NON-combustible insulation with light-stabilized properties and laid up to the shield in met. pipe with a wall thickness of at least 3.2 mm.


In the end, we consider what dangers can be expected from the OHL itself.

VL emergency situations

 

 

Fig. 15. Emergency situations on overhead lines

Fig. 15 shows a transformer substation (TP) from which the trunk line of the overhead line goes and from it branches are made to enter the house. In one house s.TN-C-S is made and in another s.T.T. Possible emergency situations on the overhead line are numbered 1-4. Emergency No. 1 - common to both houses - is a break in the PEN wire on the overhead line. Emergency # 2 is a break in the PEN wire on the branch to the house (that is, from the pole to the house). Emergency number 3 - failure to re-ground the PEN wire at the entrance to the house. Emergency No. 4 - a zero wire break on a branch to the house.

If we analyze emergency situations No. 1-4, provided that we MANDATORYly installed a circuit breaker, an RCD and an ILV relay, then: In case of emergency No. 1 in the TN-C-S system, a high potential is possible with a failure of re-grounding on the HRE electrical equipment. There is no such danger in the TT system. In case of emergency No. 2, the TN-C-S system does not have short circuit protection in the wiring. There is such protection in the TT system. In case of accidents No. 3 and No. 4, the house with the TN-C-S system and the house with the TT system are equally protected. From all this we can conclude that the TT system is the safest.

At the end of the article I want to offer in the discussion order. You probably noticed that in private residential buildings PUE 1.7.145 allows you to simultaneously break PE, L and N wires. Of course, I took advantage of this right and reflected it in the figure. It is clear and why this is necessary. It is very good if the machine itself automatically disconnected all the wires at the input, when the voltage on the PE wire would rise, for example, to 60 volts.

Further in the figure I give a diagram that allows this to be implemented. The diagram shows a 3-pole circuit breaker, for example, BA47-29 and a PH47 relay. The machine is installed on the dinreake and next to it is installed on the side of the relay, which is mechanically interlocked with the machine. If you now apply a voltage of 230 volts to the relay, then it will work and turn off the machine. Next, I write everything approximately, since the scheme needs to be brought to mind.

In discussion order

We reason like this. Assume that the relay operates at a voltage of 0.8x230 = 180 volts (it can be precisely specified during the experiment). When the voltage on the PE wire rises, for example, up to 60 volts, between the L wire and the PE wire will be 220 + 60 = 280 volts. Then 280-180 = 100 volts, this means that 220-100 = 120 volts <180 volts and the relay will not work, and 280-100 = 180 volts = 180 volts and the relay will work.

In the diagonal of the bridge, turn on the transistor. When the voltage at the zener diode is 100 volts (we select a zener diode at 100 volts), the transistor will open and the relay will trip. The machine will turn off and break the L, PE and N conductors and at the same time the power circuit of the relay itself will break.

Continuation of the article: Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 3. Lightning protection

See also at i.electricianexp.com:

  • Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 1
  • Electrosafe private house and cottage. Part 4 (ending). Examples of choosing Y ...
  • Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 4. Overvoltage protection ...
  • Electrosafe private residential building and cottage. Part 3. Lightning protection
  • What you need to know when installing an RCD and an earthing device in a ...

  •  
     
    Comments:

    # 1 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    At the end of the article, you clearly explain that the reliability of the TT system is higher. Why then fence in the more complex TN-C-S ???

     
    Comments:

    # 2 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Garik. So requires PUE 1.7.57 and 1.7.59

     
    Comments:

    # 3 wrote: Alexander (Alex Gal) | [quote]

     
     

    In principle, the article is correct and interesting. But I have a few comments.

    1. The author did not say anything about the SPD. And this is a very important issue in the case of an individual house connected to the overhead line. I think this is an omission. From the latest recommendations on this subject, Technical Circular No. 30/2012.

    2. Mentioning the TT system and technical circular No. 31/2012, the author nevertheless departed from his recommendation when choosing the RCD for the TT system. The circular recommends an RCD of 300mA, not 30, as advised by the author of the article. And it seems to me that the circular is more accurate in this respect. For automatic shutdown at the input, it is precisely 100 - 300mA that will be simultaneously considered fire-fighting.

    30mA is clearly not enough for a normal modern house with a three-wire power supply. For an old house where the network is two-wire - this is enough since there will be no regular leaks from the housings of electrical appliances to the ground. But if there is grounding, then the total leakage current from household appliances may be close to the trip current of the RCD. Let me remind you that a 30mA RCD can operate at a current of 15mA to 30mA. Each device: surge protector, PC, monitor, printer, microwave, etc. gives a standard leakage of 1.5-2.5 mA. Therefore, for a large house, it would be better to divide the loads into several RCDs, at least for a couple.

    Well, the introductory UZO at 100-300mA will protect the whole house and guarantees against false positives.

    3. For some reason, everyone always writes only about the danger of a broken PEN conductor. I want to add that for most OHLs, it is a very common event - a gouging of wires, sticking them together. And if the closure of the phase wires often leads to the operation of the machine on the transformer, then the phase cohesion with zero on long overhead lines can last for hours. And this mode is no better in its consequences than a breakdown of the zero wire of the overhead line, and sometimes much worse.

    No additional measures are required to protect against this, all the same voltage relay and TT system with its own grounding.

    4. Regarding the TT system. The fact that the reliability of the TT system is higher is a misconception. In general, the TN-C-S system is more reliable since the protection in it works with large short-circuit currents, which are easier to rebuild. Tracking mA is somewhat more difficult, such devices are sometimes sensitive to interference, interference and prone to false positives.

    But in certain cases, protection in TN-C-S does not provide such reliability, since it does not provide the necessary performance. Old-style overhead lines with non-insulated wires are just such a case. Here, the CT is the only way to turn off quickly, to get rid of the voltage on the body of the appliance connected to the PEN conductor of the line. This will help get rid of the short-circuit current on the overhead line, which can drain through your input, into your re-grounding of the PEN conductor at the input to your house. Do you need it so that your input is loaded with such current with poor repeated grounding on the overhead line itself?

    But the TT has its drawbacks, for example, the ability to carry high voltage when shorted to the housing on the high voltage side of the TP.

    In this case, the voltage at the object with CT earthing between its own earth and phase can reach several kilovolts. Will the insulation of the appliance withstand such a voltage? Yes, such a case is much less likely than a break or a zero crossing with a phase on the overhead line, but nevertheless it is possible and is considered one of the main disadvantages of the TT system.

     
    Comments:

    # 4 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Alexander. Thanks for the criticism. I will answer in order.
    1. SPD I will consider in a new article.
    2. In the shopping center ..... it is written UP to 300 mA, not 300 mA. Then you are absolutely right.
    3.When the phase and neutral wires are whipped together on the overhead line, if the protection on the TP does not work, at the entrance to the house there will be in the worst case two opposite phases or two phases of the same name. Then it will work as I wrote the pH relay and turn off our house. The fault current for re-grounding will still not be large and this is not terrible, moreover, such an accident immediately becomes noticeable for the whole street and it will be quickly eliminated.
    4. So I wrote that s.TT is better than s.TN-C-S - this applies when comparing both systems under equal given conditions. In reality, these conditions are not equivalent, therefore, based on specific conditions, you have to choose what will be better.
    5. Closing the high-voltage wire to the ground of the transformer substation will cause MTZ to trip at 10 kV switchgear and the high-voltage feeder will be disconnected. Even if this does not happen, the phase-to-earth current does not spread throughout the village, but is limited to local ground within the TP. For this reason, no current from the earth will enter our house.
    Sincerely, Mironov S.I

     
    Comments:

    # 5 wrote: Alexander (Alex Gal) | [quote]

     
     

    Quote: Mironov S.I
    In the shopping center ..... up to 300 mA is written, not 300mA.

    You are right, just :) you need to consider the note to this item:

    Note. The installation of an RCD with a differential trip current IΔn up to 300 mA at the input is mandatory and with point of view of ensuring fire safety.

    What RCDs are installed at the entrance to the house in terms of fire safety? Just 100-300mA. In addition, for about two years now, in the NET journal, when answering such questions, representatives of Rostekhnadzor have been talking specifically about RCDs at 300 mA, without any “before”. A similar requirement is present in the collection of technical circulars 2004-2006. with comments by AA Shalygin, the 2007 edition of the Moscow Institute of Energy and Economics So it’s more correct to talk about RCD on large differential currents.

    On the second question, everything is correct. But the fact that "such an accident will immediately be visible to the whole street" is debatable enough, and besides, such knowledge will not bring any relief if there is no LV or if it is "grounded" from the PEN conductor. With a short circuit, the voltage in the network in one phase exceeds 300 V and is close to zero in the closed circuit. Well, at zero it will be far from zero :). I mentioned this only because this happens on the overhead line much more often than a zero break, but with the same result.

    Quote: Mironov S.I
    Shorting the high-voltage wire to the ground of the transformer substation will cause the MTZ to trip at 10 kV switchgear and the high-voltage feeder will be disconnected

    You are mistaken here. A single-phase earth fault for a 10kV line is not a critical emergency condition and never shuts down. In such cases, a signal relay is triggered in the 10kV switchgear, and the line continues to operate in normal mode, it has almost no effect on the 0.4kV consumer. This is one of the advantages of an isolated neutral, in which the search for damage occurs without disconnecting the consumer. Disable only at the time of elimination.

    Concerning the fact that "fault current flows throughout the village." There is also a mistake. Do not forget that this is not an earthed neutral phase, but an isolated one. And "spread throughout the village" she will have no desire :). It’s just that this case is really rare in practice, usually a short circuit of one phase quickly turns into a phase-to-phase one and then the protection on the 10kV line already really works. Nevertheless, in my practice this happened.

     
    Comments:

    # 6 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Good day!
    In our city, energy sales require the installation of meters on poles in front of a private house. How to organize the connection diagram. Three phases and the neutral from the wires from the column through the introductory machine are connected to the counter in the shield on the column. Three phases from the meter and the neutral from the pole are connected to the distribution panel in the house. There is a grounding circuit near the house in close proximity to the switchboard in the house.And another question is that it is better to put a three-phase voltage monitoring relay with a common neutral or set the LVR separately for each phase and whether it is necessary to separate the neutrals in phases or leave the neutral common for all phases? Thanks in advance.

     
    Comments:

    # 7 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello. We need a temporary shutdown of this RCD device, how can this be achieved without breaking the seal. Is it possible to patch up this lever with tape - for about 10 minutes every week. Or what do you recommend. Thanks in advance for your reply. Helena.

     
    Comments:

    # 8 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello! Please tell me if the bath is located 40m from the storage, is it possible to use this storage, or is it necessary to install additional storage specifically for the bath?

     
    Comments:

    # 9 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello. I have this question. In my house there is a three-phase input, an ABB voltage relay with neutral control is installed. Grounding TN-C-S. In the event of a neutral break, will not the voltage relay take my ground loop for zero and disconnect the line?

     
    Comments:

    # 10 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello. I have a comment - in the diagrams of Fig. 12 and 13, the HROs are connected to the OSUP in series. This is not true, it is necessary in parallel.

    And the second - in my city the situation is the same as described by Konstantin, i.e. there is an opening machine to the counter and 2 wires go to the house. How in this case to organize the separation of zeros ?? In all documents this is done before the counter, but is it possible to do the separation after the counter ?? No where about it is not written. And can I still ground zero after the counter ??