Categories: Controversial issues, Interesting electrical news, How does it work, Energy saving
Number of views: 859302
Comments on the article: 212

Energy saving appliances: myth or reality?

 

Energy saving appliances: myth or reality?Not so long ago, in our markets, on the Internet, in some print media and even on television, an advertisement for a miracle device appeared, which, according to advertisers, can save up to 30-35% of electricity. What kind of device is this? How is it arranged? And is it really true that he is able to save so much energy?

At about the same time, in different regions, these devices appeared under different names. Here are the approximate names of these same devices: SberBox, smartbox, Energy Saver, Pover Saver, Saving-box, Powersave, Economy etc.

According to manufacturers, and accordingly distributors, it is enough to simply plug the device into a power outlet, and it starts to work, that is, save our hard-earned money.

The cost of this device, depending on the region of distribution and the "generosity" of sellers, ranged from $ 10 to $ 70. In the simplest version, the device is designed for 15 kW of load for a single-phase network, that is, for an average house. There are also devices for three phase networks. For example, such a device for saving energy, designed to operate in a three-phase network, for a load of up to 48 kW, has the dimensions of an ordinary pack of washing powder.

The first acquaintance with the description of this device for saving energy causes delight among electrical engineers, mixed with a sense of their own incompetence. The device has a solid list of features realized with the help of mysterious, patented technical innovations.

It is difficult for specialists to imagine how it is possible to implement such functions as reactive power compensation, interference filtering, protection from phase imbalance and lightning strikes in one device. The revolutionary possibility of converting reactive electric energy into active energy has no analogues at all. Such a prospect immediately brings the power engineers of industrial enterprises into a state of ecstasy.

Let's take a closer look at the wonderful product and think about whether it is possible to realize all the declared characteristics in one device. And aren't they asking too little for him? Indeed, automatic capacitor units of comparable power are 4-6 times more expensive.


Stabilizers for balancing voltage imbalance in phases are also not cheap. Harmonic filters, bulky products containing a large amount of iron and copper, also do not suffer from a low price. Combining the capabilities of all these devices in one product is truly an impressive achievement.

Energy-saving Smart Boy

Energy-saving Smart Boy

In advertising articles, magnificent photos of the appearance of the device, connection diagrams are given. But images of devices with an open case are almost impossible to find. And you can understand why: instead of the declared 5 blocks and modules, such as a programmable controller and a control (?) Transformer, there is a simple, poor set of parts.

So, we purchased one of these devices, in order to try to deal with it. What is he like? This is a small box that resembles an ordinary charger, on the front panel there are two LEDs.

Taking the liberty, we tried to look inside this miraculous device. What did we see inside? Inside was a diode bridge, a capacitor of indefinite capacity and a small power supply from which the LEDs were powered. And ... actually all. The most expensive part is a stylish case with a network plug. The total cost of components is unlikely to exceed $ 3-4, and the cheapest model is already sold for 40. What kind of energy savings can we talk about with such a scheme?


how Smart boy saves energy

So still, due to what happens energy saving when using this type of energy-saving appliances? And here it is necessary to plunge a little into the theory, without it anywhere. Let's try to explain everything in a simple, understandable language.

So, energy is active and reactive. We will not dwell on the higher harmonics, interferences in the power supply, phase shifts and other tricks, we will only consider what you can really encounter in real life, in everyday life, so to speak.

Ordinary household consumers of electricity, that is, you and I, pay for the consumption of active energy. Large enterprises also pay for jet energy. For this, they have special counters installed that count this very reagent.

In fact, they, enterprises, do not consume, they produce it. That is, equipment with a large inductive component generates reactive energy, which additionally loads the network. In order to "unload" electrical networks from negative loads, there are special devices - Reactive Power Compensators, that is, CRM.

These very KPMs, rather bulky and complex devices, moreover, they are initially calculated for a certain load. And this miracle device, which is actually being discussed now, if it can save something, theoretically, then only with a strictly defined load. And to calculate this very load is almost impossible.

Many modern devices are already initially equipped with devices to compensate for the reactive component. So, for example, almost all computer power supplies are equipped with Passive PFC, which reduces energy consumption by 5-10%. But in this case, the ratings of the capacitance, inductor and other iron were very carefully calculated, which allowed us to reduce electricity consumption.

From all that has been written above, we can conclude that it is pointless to compensate for anything at home or in everyday conditions.

But, for the sake of fairness, our experiments in production showed that, with the use of three-phase static CRM, it yielded some results. Namely, it allowed to stabilize the phase imbalance by 10-15%, that is, to evenly distribute the load between the phases. But this is in production, where the loads were relatively constant. So, draw your own conclusions.

Power Saver

How a miracle device converts reactive energy into active

We will separately discuss the conversion of reactive energy into active. Now only the energy-saving Smart Boy device declares a similar opportunity. In electrical engineering, there is neither theoretical justification for such an opportunity, nor practical implementations of devices. All attempts to obtain more detailed technical information from dealers about this amazing opportunity were unsuccessful. They either quoted advertising presentations, or referred to the "know-how" of the developers.


The triumph of modern technology or a grandiose scam?

What alarms specialists is completely incomprehensible to the rest of the population, far from electrical engineering. Well, how can you resist when a gray-haired doctor of technical sciences (and a doctor?) On the TV screen penetrates the profitability of acquiring a device at a discount for pensioners? Judging by the scope and duration of the commercials, sales are doing well.

From the advertising device to save energy Pover Saver

From advertising device to save energy Pover Saver

In conclusion, we can say that, unfortunately, a huge number of people, including those familiar with electrical engineering, were victims of a giant scam called “Smart Boy Energy Saving” and similar devices to save energy. These devices do not have any unique or revolutionary properties; they are absolutely useless in production and, especially, in everyday life.

References to the fact that the products are certified in the CIS countries (it is understood that consumer properties are confirmed by serious organizations) is just a guile, designed to ignore the certification procedures. The check is carried out only on the basis of product safety indicators; consumer properties are not considered at all. In other words: if you have purchased bitter, like wormwood, chocolate, then it can be absolutely safe for you, but for the taste - sorry.

See also:

Is reactive electricity available?

Options for reactive energy compensation in the home using the Saving Box

New appliance and new principle of energy saving

The most economical electric home heating

Electric sockets with a timer

Multi-tariff accounting: where are the problems “buried”?

See also at bgv.electricianexp.com:

  • Is reactive electricity available?
  • Options for reactive energy compensation in the home using the Saving Box
  • What is reactive power and how to deal with it
  • New appliance and new principle of energy saving
  • Multi-tariff accounting: where are the problems “buried”?

  •  
     
    Comments:

    # 201 wrote: Tamerlan | [quote]

     
     

    Really so bad.

     
    Comments:

    # 202 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Dear friends! Let's think about the essence of the device that we are offered to buy! They called it the Power Saver i.e. that work, for example, ironing shirts, which was performed by electricity will continue to be performed, only, while electricity will be saved! The question is how? And who? You won’t save on the iron, the iron is hot or not! To save, it is well known, or to pay less for the same mass of goods (we have electricity) or for the same price to get a large mass of goods! There is no third! The Economizer Manufacturer offers the first! He suggests buying this device to consumers of electricity and just plugging it into a socket at home! Absolutely not complicated actions, which captivates! Having looked at the meter readings after half a month, the consumer sees that the energy burned out for only a week, although the same half-month amount of shirts was ironed! There is a saving for the consumer! Where did she come from? This “saving” was created by dishonest manufacturers of the device in which they installed a current transformer, the same one used by electric thieves in the 70s to rewind meter readings! Only a current transformer of the 21st century does not rewind readings, but simply brakes half of these readings without violating the integrity of the meter, the changed harmonic of the industrial frequency in the local loaded consumer network acts on the meter! And what is the cheese boron? The scandal is explained simply - one Thief is a Manufacturer, invited to the associates of another, who wanted to become a Thief, a Consumer! And steal electricity for a couple from its seller, from energy sales, hanging noodles for the whole society about the legitimacy and decency of their miracle device! The manufacturer’s profit is inherent in the cost of the device, and the consumer’s profit is half the “cost” of kilowatt hours! What a wonderful symbiosis they have! The simple technology of installing and using the Pseudo-economizer is very attractive for dishonest Consumers, who will also be very difficult to catch by a dirty hand, with their rogue device, which slows down the normal meter reading! So much for the scandal’s driving force - a hindrance device that prevents the counter from showing really consumed kilowatts for really heated irons! Engineer Fedotov

     
    Comments:

    # 203 wrote: Sergei | [quote]

     
     

    Alexander,
    seem one more twisted

     
    Comments:

    # 204 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Why convert reactive energy into active and, accordingly, also pay for this reactive energy. Individuals (household consumers) do not pay for reactive energy. These devices are useless. Scam for idiots.

     
    Comments:

    # 205 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Vova,
    For ignorant people, the higher the voltage, the lower the current, since the power of the device is constant, therefore the counter will be considered the same for any voltage.

     
    Comments:

    # 206 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    An energy-saving device is the most natural deception, designed for gullible people. After such an acquisition, there is no saving !!!!!!! All this is divorce and scam !!!

     
    Comments:

    # 207 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Here is the answer to the device! youtube.com/watch?v=ecykrRl9wKs

     
    Comments:

    # 208 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Energy-saving devices in which a capacitor is installed can potentially be effective in homes, but according to statistics, they save no more than 1-5% of electricity, because they remove the reactive losses that occur in household appliances only when the vacuum cleaner, washing machine (not direct drive), the combine, etc. are turned on. However, such consumers in the house are quite few and are rarely included and not for long.
    It should be clear to everyone that reactive power is not born "by every teapot" or incandescent lamp. Reactive power appears only when you turn on devices with a large inductive component - a winding. These are transformers in power supplies and all kinds of electric motors.
    It is practically not possible to see savings even in 5%, because monthly expenses differ by 10-30%. To calculate the savings, a special technique is required that can take into account non-linear loads, which are used by companies professionally involved in the development and implementation of energy-saving devices that are used for production purposes and successfully cope with their tasks when they are precisely applied after a comprehensive electrical audit.

     
    Comments:

    # 209 wrote: Engineer | [quote]

     
     

         On the issue of energy saving contrary to the laws of physics, the theory of electrical circuits and the physical principles of the operation of meters.

         Summarizing all of the above, we can draw the following conclusions.

         Conclusion 1. On the issue of energy savings through the use of "miracle devices". If your meter is connected strictly according to the correct scheme, and if it is technically sound and works normally, then it is impossible by any manipulations by connecting the “miracle device” to the socket to provide actual energy saving or its generation. If you buy an expensive “miracle device”, and if a normal company (or store) offers you to buy it, then ask the employees of this company or store to connect this device at your place (and not in the store, this is very important!), And together check the operability of this “miracle device” for an additional fee on your part — in case of normal operation of this “miracle device”, that is, check the operation of this device for “economy”. For example, how can this be when buying an air conditioner with installing, connecting and checking its operation.



     

           The method of checking the "miracle device" at your home, in the apartment.

    A) Preliminary preparation. Turn off absolutely all electrical appliances. Make sure that your meter shows zero power consumption, that is, you really have no power consumption. Record the readings of your meter - the electricity you have consumed at a given time. Turn on electrical appliances with a relatively constant mode of operation (electric stove, lighting lamps, TV, transformer with a constant load). Recommended power 1000 ... 4000W, depending on the characteristics and condition of your wiring, meter, batch switch, protection devices (circuit breakers, fuses, etc.). This is your test load. Note the time for switching on the test load. After 60 ... 30 minutes disconnect the test load. Take your meter reading. Determine how much kWh your test load consumed in 60 ... 30 min according to your meter.

    B) Verification of the action —test of the “miracle device”. Record your meter reading.

    Turn on the test load at the same time as the “miracle device”.After exactly the same time as you had under point A) during the first test, disconnect the test load at the same time as the “miracle device”. Take your meter reading. Determine how much kWh your test load consumed while working with the "miracle device" for a given time on your meter. The number of included "miracle devices" can be any. It is not recommended to use electrical appliances for testing, in which the power consumption varies over time, or which periodically turn on and off - a refrigerator, air conditioning, iron, etc., since the accuracy of the experimental data is significantly reduced.

    During the test, carefully monitor the "representative of the company or store", in order to prevent its interference in the test process to juggle the facts.

    C) Analyze the obtained experimental data on testing the "miracle device" in your house or apartment, with your meter and your test load. Determine if you have actual energy savings or not.

    In principle, this experiment can be carried out by any adult without special electrical knowledge, subject to the observance of the rules and measures of electrical and safety engineering.

         Even non-specialists, including competent specialists, will understand the essence of this experiment.  

     

     



         Now, I hope you are convinced that 2 * 2 = 4, not 3 or 5, as individuals tell you. Someone went to school normally and knows mathematics at the level of 2-3 grades, someone does not know and does not want to know, but these are illiterate problems. Live a century, learn a century ... -that's all, and then on to each one who needs what he gets.

     

         For example, I can offer you a “miracle faucet”, which is simple enough to stupidly install on a cold water pipe, and that’s all. Turn the handle of the tap clockwise by 1 revolution - you will have fresh milk, 2 turns - cold kvass, 3 turns - alcohol, 4 turns -91 gasoline. Believe it or not. It remains to find someone to "vparit" and, in fact, "vparit a miracle crane." Are there really those who believe in this nonsense?



     

         We continue to draw conclusions.

        Conclusion 2. On the issue of reactive power compensation. In addition to an active power meter, industrial consumers also have a reactive power meter. The point is that the more reactive power is generated by the electrical installations of industrial consumers, the more the industrial consumer pays RES (regional electric networks) for reactive power. With large capacities of industrial electrical installations, it is economically feasible to compensate reactive power using special installations. In a private residential building or apartment, with relatively small capacities of household electrical appliances and in the absence of a reactive power meter, there is no economic sense in compensating reactive power, this is irrelevant.

     

         Conclusion 3. On the issue of application GSM- stubs. Task GSM- plugs and the like - block the transfer of information data between your meter and the automated electricity metering system (ASKUE) RES on any communication channel (power circuit, information circuit or radio channel). In the event of a sudden loss of communication between your meter and the automated control system of automatic energy distribution systems, the automatic control system will instantly respond to this event and issue a message to the operators of electronic distribution systems. In addition, almost any electronic meter has the function of recording and saving in time the main parameters and operating modes, as well as events that affect the normal operation of the meter and its abnormal operating modes. All information will be stored on a solid-state electronic memory device, similar to a memory card, and all information is stored even if the meter is turned off for a long time. In any case, when applied GSM- stubs, wait soon for a visit to you from uninvited and unpleasant “guests with gifts” for you in the form of fines or proceedings.

     

         Conclusion 4.Dear site experts, suggest a really working technical solution for saving energy, but not at the expense of very expensive solar and rechargeable batteries and windmills. Any person invented a meter ...

     

     

     
    Comments:

    # 210 wrote: Victor | [quote]

     
     

    This thing is cool saves, albeit a scam. And the essence of the savings in the following, the more outlets will be occupied with this crap, the less real power consumers can be connected. This thing is cool saves, albeit a scam. And the essence of the savings in the following, the more outlets will be occupied with this crap, the less real power consumers can be connected.

     
    Comments:

    # 211 wrote: Engineer | [quote]

     
     

    Dear Victor, in comment No. 210 you absolutely definitely gave a description on the issue of saving electric energy with this “miracle device”. I totally agree with you. Free cheese happens only in a mousetrap. But I will express what you wrote more succinctly - somewhere I heard (maybe read) the following, something like this: "the most reliable way to save electricity is up to 100%, is to cut down your packet switch in the electrical panel." This method has one big advantage - no need to run around the shops and markets for this "miracle device" in order to be deceived by scammers. And knowledge has never done any harm to anyone.
    But what confuses me is that modern electronic meters have the technical ability to intervene in its work by RES employees, if they have such an unhealthy desire.
    I explain. Electronic meters constructively provide for the possibility of their "programming" through the power line to which the meter is connected, and from which power is supplied. ASKUE equipment installed in RES, has a connection to the power supply system of consumers. This "programming" can be carried out directly near the counter, using a special portable device, through an infrared optical communication channel (like a remote control and a TV). I read the passport of one such counter. Moreover, this "programming" can be performed at any time and completely imperceptibly for the subscriber, the owner of the counter. And what is this "programming", for example, you can "wind up" any inflated readings on the counter.
    Once I went to pay for electricity in RES, and I was very much surprised by the following fact. For December, January and February, according to RES, on my meter there were 250,000 kWh of electricity consumed (I saw the numbers on a computer monitor). It’s as if someone specially adjusted a mathematically rounded number separately for each month. Absolutely no scatter of three numbers for three months. Previously, when I had an old normal and honest induction meter manufactured by the USSR, there was never such amazing accuracy for months, because no one ever interfered in its work. In January, I was on a business trip for 2 weeks, this time my wife lived in my mother-in-law’s apartment, for 2 weeks one refrigerator worked.

    To my question to RES employees - “How is this possible, in three months 250,000 + 250,000 + 250,000 kWh?”, A completely stupid and impudent answer followed — we don’t know what you have in your apartment and it works. Moreover, the employees of RES with glass eyes during the answer to me have never even jumped from their insolent lies.
    It seems to me that not only I was in a similar situation, but also many other honest and conscientious people. Therefore, there is a great desire to curb in one way or another fraudulent actions by RES. Why couldn’t there be such an option on my meter 70,000 + 70,000 + 70,000 kWh. And it’s just RES not profitable.
    The desire of people to “save” is quite normal, but it is absolutely necessary to know exactly how this “electronic evil” works — RES counters that literally put people “on the counter”, i.e. always pay, but you won’t pay a fine, the court ... ... it’s good that after 1937 the execution was canceled.And you need to understand exactly how to deal with this "electronic evil spirits," because it hopes that the RESOVS will someday have a conscience, this is an ungrateful thing, faster the cancer on the mountain will whistle. But do not feed any scammers.


     
    Comments:

    # 212 wrote: Engineer | [quote]

     
     

    With the permission of the administrator of this site, I will allow myself to deviate from the topics discussed.
    Dear friends, I sincerely congratulate all of you on the upcoming New Year 2019!
    I sincerely wish you all the best, and most importantly, health to you and happiness to your families, since all other material goods in this life can be earned or acquired.

    come back << 1 2 >> Next page