Categories: Interesting Facts, Controversial issues
Number of views: 374,408
Comments on the article: 165

How to make a perpetual motion machine with your own hands

 

This article was submitted to the site bgv.electricianexp.com by Nikolai Kapitanov. According to him, he came up with and created a model of a perpetual motion machine. Nikolay very persistently asked to give him the opportunity to talk about his invention using our site. Well, let's look at the perpetual motion machine of the author of the article. I will be glad to hear your comments. What do you think about it? Well, first, the article itself:

Does the perpetual motion machine still exist?

According to the scheme below, a real and fully functional model of a perpetual motion machine was developed.

The diagram shows a more simplified connection of the working elements, namely, the connection of the engine anchors and generators and a single aggregate shaft, in real execution a belt drive was used.

The generator and electric motor were fixed so that when starting the electric motor could simultaneously rotate the generator shafts.

To create a prototype of the engine used a conventional car battery and the same generator 1 with a standard 12 voltage. The generator 2, relative to the generator 1 was made smaller, thereby it produces less working energy and reduces the load on the electric motor.

For the perpetual motion machine, a conventional motor from a grinder was used, which can work without overheating, can rotate the generator armature in the range from 2000-5000 rpm, so it can work both with a load and with the addition of an additional generator with a lower load. Strengthens or provides alternating current converter MAP "Energy", which receives input energy from the battery.

The converter or current amplifier "Energy" increases the voltage of the incoming current from the battery, from standard variables 12v to 220v. Already converted direct current provided the electric motor with a power consumption of 1200 watts.

Perpetual motion diagram

Perpetual motion diagram

In an electric circuit, using wires connect: Generator 1, battery, electric motor and amplifier. The energy that comes from the battery is amplified, converted to 220V, and from the amplifier the alternating current flows to the electric motor, which in turn begins to rotate the shafts of the anchors, simultaneously of two generators, and the generators themselves begin to generate electric current.

Despite the fact that the generator 1 begins to produce a direct current of 12 V and recharges the battery, and the needs of the consumer, that is, the target current for the population will be provided by generator 2.

After starting the mechanism, the accumulated energy of the battery is not completely wasted, due to the continuous recharging, this ensures a continuous operation circuit.

An application has been filed for this mechanism with the Federal State Institution FIPS.

Nikolay Kapitanov

See also: Minato Magnetic Motor

See also at bgv.electricianexp.com:

  • Diesel generator - device and principle of operation
  • Types of electric generators and the principles of their work
  • Inverter-type generators - 3 fat pluses!
  • Generator Maintenance - 5 Easy Steps
  • How to connect the generator yourself

  •  
     
    Comments:

    # 1 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    "The converter or current amplifier" Energy "increases the voltage of the incoming current from the battery, from standard variables 12v to 220v."
    from the battery receive not alternating, but direct current.

     
    Comments:

    # 2 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Yes, that’s all nonsense, kindergarten. There are so many nuances that mother does not grieve. You probably heard about such a concept as efficiency and so on ... in short, it will not work all, and who needs your 6 volts at the output?

     
    Comments:

    # 3 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Thank you, and we’re stupid building nuclear power plants, turning water into superheated steam, feeding them to the turbines of the generators, rotating them, but you just need to free 99 percent of the area of ​​the nuclear power plant by replacing the power units with electric motors.
    Ehh, your idea would have been a little earlier in Japan and closed nafig focusu1 and all the rest wink
    And so we look according to the scheme.
    1. Inverter (amplifier) ​​efficiency 90%
    2. Engine, generator, generator efficiency of 90%
    3. Battery efficiency 80%
    And now the question is where the energy for the consumer comes from.
    The presented circuit will not work very long (until the battery is completely discharged).
    It makes no sense even to recall the law of conservation of energy.
    Perpetual motion - device with an efficiency of at least 100%
    and here are some losses.
    It is incomprehensible the choice of 6V. Really for you there are no other generators, or 6V magic voltage coming from nowhere.
    And about the application
    An application can be filed, but that's just how much I remember perpetual motion machines are not patented.
    Vobschem spent time, read looked and realized the scheme is designed for a stupid schoolboy, of which there are many on the network.

    I looked at your humor section. The article should be placed there.

     
    Comments:

    # 4 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The problem of any perpetual motion machine is the friction force to overcome which requires energy, and the efficiency of any converter is unfortunately not non-zero ...

     
    Comments:

    # 5 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    IT WRITTEN APRIL 1 ???

     
    Comments:

    # 6 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The storytellers in Russia have not yet been translated ...

     
    Comments:

    # 7 wrote: Bakhyt | [quote]

     
     

    Why is the output only 6 volts? Could write that type 220 volts. Then they would immediately give a patent. And so probably this business is gathering dust as not very effective - the efficiency is only 150% .......

     
    Comments:

    # 8 wrote: HELEN ELUR | [quote]

     
     

    Hello! I would like to receive answers to the following questions:

    1) In an electric generator, in addition to the friction forces from the rotation of the rotor on bearings and in addition to air friction - what other forces rotor stop? Is counteracting rotary A MAGNETIC FIELD on a winding when inducing current in it - the third and last cause of resistance to the "eternal" rotation of the anchor in generator?

    2) Why it is impossible to create a hybrid generator that would be independent maintained its conditionally perpetual rotation with the help of the rotor of the generator of a small engine, which would in turn constantly supported the rotation of the generator, fueled constantly reborn electricity? Or the generated energy will be almost all go to that engine? And then in what possible (or impossible) would such a method be economically justified?

    3) Could instead of such an engine, for example, a solenoid or an electromagnet "push" the generator rotor? For example, somewhere on the side of tightly arrange small additional disk on the rotor in a circle permanent magnets and periodically "irradiate" them with these electromagnets located outside the rotor and powered by the winding of this the same generator ... or the poles on such electromagnets will be constantly change and not coincide with the pole of permanent magnets (if their arrange with the same poles), that is, the repulsion effect will not always work? Maybe there are already similar interesting best practices in the field of power generation by classical rotation? We really need an environmentally friendly, "self-living" home generator.

    Thanks in advance.

     
    Comments:

    # 9 wrote: Alexander S. | [quote]

     
     

    Education reform is bearing fruit. :()

     
    Comments:

    # 10 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Dear schoolchildren! You do not understand the essence of the proposal. You have been given a source of energy for food at least at home, at least an apartment. And consumers are given only 6 Volts, and where are your brains, think and connect instead of a 6 V generator, a 220 Volt generator, who interferes with a narrow look and super-trained envy.

     
    Comments:

    # 11 wrote: Alexander S. | [quote]

     
     

    Methodius,
    Did you understand what you said?

     
    Comments:

    # 12 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    This is all the garbage that is shown in the picture, not forever. I’m sure that somewhere in a week or there in a month or in a year the iron tube will rust, the battery will run out, because it will consume more power, etc. and he will no longer work. If there will be interruptions or some other cataclysms - Khan to your perpetual motion machine! So dear readers do not fall for it! Such a perpetual motion machine will not be perpetual! But I know that all the same, in the distant future, unknown to us, the perpetual motion machine will be created not so fig, but much better!

     
    Comments:

    # 13 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    As a child, I assembled a similar design, I was sure that it would certainly work, but alas, a complete failure.

     
    Comments:

    # 14 wrote: Aleksey-212 | [quote]

     
     

    Smiled !!!! A year ago, I could not even imagine that there is a wireless transmission of electricity. Everything can be, only we will know about it when the time comes!

     
    Comments:

    # 15 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Some kind of law of current in a closed circuit will eat all the current from the battery even without load, and it will not even spin with the load. That is, as soon as they create a black hole, then we will immediately have an eternal engine!

     
    Comments:

    # 16 wrote: alex | [quote]

     
     

    Tomorrow I will begin to assemble the design of the perpetual motion machine described in the article. True, I could not find all the elements and I’m modernizing something. I think that from this the perpetual motion machine will not cease to be perpetual :-) Yes, and still need a battery amplifier. Something must be found somewhere similar to a flea market. Here I even have some ideas for improving the proposed scheme. Everything must earn! How to start - I will report the results. I believe that the perpetual motion machine is real!

     
    Comments:

    # 17 wrote: Rus | [quote]

     
     

    Yes, it is doubtful that this will work. In childhood, I also thought about this option, but if we exclude the battery from this circuit, then we could call it an eternal engine and put some drives on the capacitors. And why convert 12 to 220? Isn’t it easier to put a 12 volt motor and remove the consumer? It is not necessary for the perpetual motion machine, it is enough that it rotates itself endlessly.

     
    Comments:

    # 18 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    So I’m sitting and thinking that it’s unnecessary to use phrases that are incomprehensible to schoolchildren so that they do not fail with a report on physics, to begin with, the laws of physics are not always the same everywhere, for example, in another galaxy very different laws of physics (where one falls, the other takes off) - that is, not all can be explained by our laws, not much time will pass and we will discover all new laws, in general, in my opinion, physics should be rewritten a long time ago, and the laws should be divided into 2 classes, general (which will include the laws of our universe, extra-planetary nature) and internal (for the Department n planets, stars and so on ...). After revising our physics of mathematics - maybe we can create something similar, take space too and parallel worlds (which incidentally applies to space), plus the human brain does not work to its fullest: D

     
    Comments:

    # 19 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Well, have everyone been smart? Who else wants to remember school? I read and wanted to cry !!! They made smart guys - and who picked up the soldering iron and rushed off to look for the engine and generator to assemble the circuit honestly to say that this does not work? NO ONE!!! But you don’t know whether the author was right or not. Respect to the author !!!

     
    Comments:

    # 20 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Dtolok,
    And what's the point of taking a soldering iron and assembling this design. Do not go to the fortuneteller, so it’s clear that the idea is dead end. The engine will not work for long until the battery sits down - the inverter will "suck" the current out of it much stronger than the generator will produce, especially since the generator will rotate under load with a large resistance.

     
    Comments:

    # 21 wrote: Nic | [quote]

     
     

    Papilac does not fly without a gravitsapa!
    Therefore, 2 times KU, you can’t do without yellow pants here!

     
    Comments:

    # 22 wrote: Pavlik | [quote]

     
     

    Someone disappeared comrade alex, who wanted to assemble this design of a perpetual motion machine in real life. Alex, how are you? It's just that everyone has been waiting for it already. Does this perpetual motion machine work or not work? It’s just interesting. Stop torturing us! Get the test results!

     
    Comments:

    # 23 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    if you look even without efficiency, then the electric motor is 1200 watts, i.e.

    1200/12 = 100 Amperes ... 40 Amp Generator will not take out

     
    Comments:

    # 24 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Well, if he even worked forever, then ...

    This is not a perpetual motion machine, because. The ETERNAL engine must provide energy not only to itself ... And this is impossible ...

     
    Comments:

    # 25 wrote: Dimon | [quote]

     
     

    They arrived ... nothing comes from nowhere and disappears nowhere, they tell you about efficiency, but you don’t hear ... Even in space in orbit, satellites gradually spiral (due to gravity and friction about not absolute vacuum) descend lower to Earth from every revolution, and here some kind of perpetual motion machines invented ...

     
    Comments:

    # 26 wrote: Da vinci | [quote]

     
     

    Nikolay Kapitanov, from what mental hospital did you run away dear?

     
    Comments:

    # 27 wrote: Magomed Ramazanov | [quote]

     
     

    By the end of January, perhaps I will introduce you to the current model of the perpetual motion machine, which gives useful work.

     
    Comments:

    # 28 wrote: Vladimir | [quote]

     
     

    It would be good to heat the whole house with another match, tired of dumping gas ..., if only they would call it as a heading.

     
    Comments:

    # 29 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    De,

    At least one smart person was found, counted the power of the generator and engine. And I’ll also say there is nothing eternal.

     

    I apologize, but here's a diagram for you: a battery, a motor, 3 dynamos on a magnetic pad (no friction), two of them are to the battery. Voalya, fuck!

    ps But it’s not so simple: a battery, an amplifier MAP "Energy" .... EVERYTHING !!!

    ss Nobody told you about magnetic perpetual motion machines? Or about gravitational (slower). Or flywheel ??? Stupidly enter in Yandex: the perpetual motion machine on magnets.

    in advance: who did not enter and comments (scolds) me?

     
    Comments:

    # 31 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    SW Nikolai Kapitanov, still it was necessary not to skip physics at school.

    There is no need to even consider the generator power, and so it is clear that even without the consumption of energy by the consumer, the design will not work long.

    For those who write "they didn’t collect, but criticize, it’s possible to earn money" - we include our brains, comrades. (If they certainly are). We assemble this system, connect it. We look - the engine has turned off, the generator has started and even gives charging current! Everything seems to be fine - but something spinning became slower. WHY??? But because of the efficiency, for example, 100 W of energy goes to the motor, and from the generator it comes back to the battery - only 50 W.

    AND WHY???? The truant will ask.

    But because any device for converting energy converts part of the energy into heat. In the heat of heating bearings, in the heat of heating transistors in a 12 \ 220V converter, in the heat of heating the windings of transformers or a motor with a generator (the wires have resistance, which is why they heat up, this is how an electric kettle works, for example).

    So it turns out that we feed 100 W to the motor - after the motor we have 80 W of rotation + 20 W of heat, these 80 W go to the generator - from the generator we have 60 W of electric energy + 20 W of heat, 60 W we supply to the MAP - from it we have 50 W of energy 220V, + 10W heat.

    Well, why are the numbers "+20 watts of heat" and "+10 watts of heat" different - figure it out for yourself, dear boys and girls, the hint is "efficiency".

    For lovers of vacuum and superconductivity - current collection from vacuum super-flywheels is carried out using coils, i.e. all the same heating of the conductors remains.

    And refrigerators for the production of liquid nitrogen and helium consume so much energy that they are still used only in scientific laboratories.

     
    Comments:

    # 32 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    But what if for example: we have a ~ 3Kv wind generator, it is installed, its impeller rotates by the wind, the batteries charge, the consumer also has it - well, everything is standard.And now we take the engine, remove the impeller - “so as not to interfere”, connect the engine ~ 1-1.5Kv to its place - it can also be done in a belt drive, the engine is powered from the consumer’s outlet and that’s all. The generator rotates - the batteries are charging - in turn, they feed the electric. an engine which in turn rotates the generator itself.

     
    Comments:

    # 33 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I don’t know why such a complicated scheme, everything is much simpler and works for me. those. A 7.2 V magnetic motor spins a magnetic generator at the output of which a 12-volt 40-watt bulb and the bulb burns brightly on a 9-volt device. and what does physics have to do with it, now I’ll make the installation bigger and more powerful, and there, as God willing.

     
    Comments:

    # 34 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Good all the time you pleased me)))

    I have a question for all those who do not believe that this is not a perpetual motion machine:

    Why are Steam Turbines created ??

    if you can just take your magnetic motor and all the energy here it is you say no where

    but there is one but also very large

    magnets in my opinion fade away after 7 years i.e. they are there like fuel and with them they can’t even reach the capacity of 1 MVA (mega-volt amperes is a measure of full power) and the power plants produce them in thousands.

    about the scheme from above it was ridiculous to look at it, even the creator was in the bastard to collect because it is simply not working and will not even work there for a month, but for a maximum of a week, at the best case it is about the scheme

    Further, if you simply connect the engine generator electrically and mechanically and try to give it an initial speed, the energy conservation law will work i.e. it will not even spin itself, i.e.

    the created moving magnetic field will begin to act in generating emf (energy) and it is compensated by another.

    Now if you put a battery in this circuit, at best it will spin like 2 electric motors in one direction, observing the polarity in the worst case, and the reverse magnetization current will go and Akum will explode

    and about the circuit above the efficiency times the electrical and mechanical resistance two by three voltage 6 V))

    who cares, go to study at power engineers there they will tell you everything and show and prove there are no perpetual motion machines

     
    Comments:

    # 35 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Eeeh, you sir ...
    Nobody drove into the subject, only one neutron neutron realized - respect.
    The whole point is in the MAP Energy amplifier (by the way, who knows what a MAP is).
    He consumes 600 watts from the battery, and the motor twists on all 1200.
    And you efficiency, efficiency ...
    Yeah, it would be funny if it weren’t so sad.
    In my time, any eighth-grader, using only the law of conservation of energy, would merge this perpetual motion machine into the trash for one-two-three.
    Damn, am I really destined to live up to the time when the expedition to the edge of the earth will be organized, in order to find out - on whom do the elephants holding the Earth with trunks still stand - on whales or on a turtle?

     
    Comments:

    # 36 wrote: Vladimir | [quote]

     
     

    Yeah !!! 35 comments on the theme of perpetual motion !!!!!!!!!!! Well ignoramus violates the laws of nature. And you! 35 people practice in a science-like chatter. Well, do not prove him anything. It is like a debate between pointed and blunt. Remember Gulliver’s journey to similar creatures. As for the name of the device MAP, I propose its decoding "" Manically Astral Pendrezh "." Probably similar devices are developed by KASCHENKO in the laboratories of his patients, who get there with the secret password "03". Reception of geniuses - round the clock !!!!!!!!!

     
    Comments:

    # 37 wrote: Stanislav | [quote]

     
     

    Nothing ever lasts. But still you can get free energy ... for this you need to go the other way that Nikola Tesla did. Energy can be pumped out of the ether. A quarter-wave resonator is capable of this, which consists of two resonant circuits tuned to the same frequency. The coils are wound one on top of the other, and the length of the coil wire of the first (input) circuit should be 4 times less than the length of the coil wire of the second (output) circuit. High voltage capacitors.A spark gap with a spark gap distance of 1 - 1.5 mm is included in the open circuit of the input circuit. The input circuit capacitor is charged from a DC voltage source of at least 1000 volts. In this situation, the power that the output circuit can give is several times greater than the power that is pumped into the input circuit.

     
    Comments:

    # 38 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Methodius,
    Here I read comments here and quietly okhuyev @ yu. It’s not even a matter of educational reform. Now, if you are tormented by such questions, then you need to study at least the basics. When you build a house, will you also start from the roof? Not. So, the point here is no longer the efficiency of the generator and engine, but the forces arising during operation. Take the motor from the player, let the ends of the wires hang in the air. Unroll it. Easy to spin? Yes! Now lock the ends together and rotate. Now how? Much more difficult.
    Now, if you have an ammeter, you can conduct the opposite experiment. Connect the battery, ammeter and motor in series: the motor will spin, the ammeter will show the current consumption. Grab the motor shank and stop it without breaking the chain. Current consumption increased several times. Is the principle clear? If necessary, repeat the experiments.
    Remember Baron Munchausen, how he pulled himself along with the horse from the swamp by the hair on his head, without a fulcrum? So, to believe that the motor, spinning the generator, will produce excess energy, is the same as believing that you can pull yourself out of the swamp by the hair without a fulcrum. If you believe this, then try pulling your hair up. Did you manage to raise yourself above the ground?

     
    Comments:

    # 39 wrote: Kirill | [quote]

     
     

    People!!! Don’t you understand?!?!? There is no perpetual motion machine, it was not and never will be !!! Reread the laws of physics. The eternal engine is not possible in the first place, because energy cannot come from somewhere and go somewhere. Even Nikola Tesla, who lived in the 1800s, proved this. "And the proposed scheme will gobble up itself even without a consumer !!!" - quote. And secondly, the efficiency of the perpetual motion machine should be at least 100%. And this is not possible !!!!!!!!!!!!!! And finally, thirdly, the magnets in electric motors would still be discharged after 80 years or much later, but they would be discharged anyway, and this is not a perpetual motion machine anyway !!!!!!!!
    So, there is NO "ETERNAL ENGINE", NO, AND WILL NOT, NEVER !!!!!!!!

     
    Comments:

    # 40 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    HA-ALL PHYSICS AMAZING! HA HA HA And they don’t know that physics has long been perverted, to the benefit of energy sellers. And you teach her stupidly instead of testing in practice! Yes, in electrical engineering, you can put a bunch of experiments and LIVE TO MAKE SURE that many axioms of physics A FALSE LIE! And you believe her! HA HA HA!

    - Gritskevich created an eternal generator which - fed the village with 2,000 inhabitants for 5 years. He offered ngo to Putin - the answer is NOT NECESSARY! And now Gritskevich in America.

    - Kapanadze built a generator, again not needed.

    - Bolotov, from the water - gas drives, in his car instead of gasoline ordinary air is burned - DO NOT!

    - Behind D. Motovilov In general, the FSB arranged a hunt - they follow every step.

    - In Sweden since the 80s, several workshops of the community have been feeding the perpetual engines of TESTATIC - and the media are naturally silent.

    - Stepanov the plant openly demonstrated a converter with an efficiency of> 150% and showed it on TV - NO!

    Well, and besides, various foreign firms are actively installing perpetual motion machines, with wired autopsy and self-liquidation - the media - are silent.

    Oh YOU - woe-physicists, tell you at school that the Earth is FLAT -You would prove it with foam at your mouth :) Well and the TROLLS paid also try.

     
    Comments:

    # 41 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    You would tell, my friend, what axioms of physics are a clear lie, and what experiments must be carried out to be convinced of this. Very interestingly simple.

     
    Comments:

    # 42 wrote: Gendalf | [quote]

     
     

    Number 40 5 points! I agree.Once they thought that iron troughs in the air would never fly .. Where to them.
    I'll start globally. We live in a world in which power is in the hands of scum who spit on the lives of billions of people for the sake of their enrichment. They enjoy all the benefits of civilization, have knowledge hidden from humanity, and consider themselves the ruling elite, which does not include all sorts of Putin and Obama, with similar puppets acting on the box, screaming in full throat about a better life .. And for these reasons, for obvious reasons neither our knowledge of the true laws of nature, nor our aspirations to create something really useful for society that will heal, work, replenish and help 100%. This totalitarian-elite layer will come up with new false paths for science, new "incurable" diseases, and vaccines that develop infertility, they will create laws even more restricting the freedom of citizens and will continue to introduce the ideology of devastation and chaos into the brains of people, sucking out of us just enough to exist and serve them. They control the media, GMO products, psychological weapons, and the entertainment industry. They have everything so that we think not about what it’s worth, but about boobs, money, cool cars and other garbage. Life will pass. And no one will trample against them, there are not many of them, but they are together. There are billions of us, but we are apart. We were divided in everything: religion, science, culture. We will rather kill each other, condemn, laugh, than unite and create, discover something that fundamentally changes the life and course of the history of the whole planet. Already a lot of everything has been invented, deliberately hidden from us.

     
    Comments:

    # 43 wrote: Alexander Molokov | [quote]

     
     

    Gendalf, well now let's chorus "we are being deceived!" Where, in what, how exactly? I agree, one must think independently, but think, not fantasize. The fact that somewhere they invented something does not confirm the existence of a perpetual motion machine. It only means that some of the laws that we considered common are private.

     
    Comments:

    # 44 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Methodius,
    Methodius! Brother! I support you in this dispute.
    We take the temperature balance, which is difficult to check easily.
    Firstly, the theoretical (flameless) combustion temperature of the combustion of kerosene and all petroleum fuels is 3350 degrees. Judging by the color of the flame of a kerosene lamp, its burning temperature is 1400 degrees. Consequently, the efficiency of the combustion process is 40.5%!
    Further - The temperature of the residual heat (heat exiting from the lamp glass) -
    700 degrees. The color of the thin steel wire placed above the lamp section is raspberry, which corresponds to 700 - 800 degrees.
    Therefore, the lighting efficiency is 20%. Add the temperature of the lamp glass here. The lamp efficiency will still decrease. And the efficiency of the thermogenerator will increase.
    We have reached the combustion temperature of petroleum fuels up to 4500 degrees, which exceeds the theoretical, by more than 1/3.
    Now about the friction in the mating parts and the energy expended in overcoming it. Modern tribotechnological preparations based on one mineral from the Eastern slopes of the Polar Urals allow, without cost, to bring the surface cleanliness class of the mating parts to the 14th. Which eliminates friction.
    Remaining power costs to overcome the dormant state of the mechanism parts, but due to the use of appropriate materials and exceeding the fuel combustion efficiency, it is possible to obtain an efficiency exceeding 100% !!!
    The main thing is not to know that this is impossible!

    Andrew!
    Steam turbines, like all turbines, are a dead end!
    Their theoretical efficiency does not exceed 52.5%. The actual efficiency is 35%. This is higher than the efficiency of gasoline internal combustion engines, but lower than diesel efficiency. We rush about with these turbines, like a fool with a written shell and rejoice.
    We have developed a steam engine with 90% efficiency !!! And a boiler unit with an effective efficiency of 95%, against 40% of the current !!!
    Only nobody needs it !!!

     
    Comments:

    # 45 wrote: Alexander Molokov | [quote]

     
     

    E-mine! But where have you got these?

    Does the country need energy-saving technologies? And there is. But what does the perpetual motion machine do?

    What is the idea of ​​perpetual motion? It is to consume more energy spent. So right? What does this contradict? Yes, even elementary logic! Look for another source of energy - cheap and efficient. But it will not be a perpetual motion machine. Efficiency will not be higher than one hundred percent - at least do something. Therefore, the article is, of course, heresy.

     
    Comments:

    # 46 wrote: reader | [quote]

     
     

    Comments Number 37 and 40 were liked the most ... and why immediately the perpetual motion machine is enough to start from 40, 50 or 100, 200 years ... (it seems to me that such installations have protection against opening by self-liquidation) if there are such developments they definitely classified. About 200 years later, by analogy with the lottery, you may get a chance to find 1/1000 of the first not very successful classified models)))) ...

    # 47 It would be logical to assume that if you can receive a signal (oscillations), convert and transmit it, then the same applies to energy ...

     
    Comments:

    # 47 wrote: Evgeny | [quote]

     
     

    The eternal engine is only the sun! Someday, there will be such a planet on which large quantities of material suitable for a solar battery will be found. That it will be possible to create a huge battery of such power that is enough for the whole world. This will happen when the oil runs out, probably :)

     
    Comments:

    # 48 wrote: Alexander Molokov | [quote]

     
     

    The eternal engine is an eternal engine, and it does not exist.

    And the Sun is a reactor of enormous, but not infinite power.

     
    Comments:

    # 49 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    It would not hurt Mr. Kapitanov to re-read the Physics Course, in particular - electrical engineering, and also to learn as the Father our Law of conservation of energy. Such a device can only work if: 1) The friction force of all mechanisms of generators and engines is 100%, not a percent less !!! 2) The efficiency of all elements of the circuit is 100%, and not a percent less !!! But these conditions are not feasible under normal circumstances, so this whole idea is an absolute bullshit !!!! From April 1st !!!!

    And also the resistance of all connecting wires and nodes of their connections is equal to absolute zero !!!!

     
    Comments:

    # 50 wrote: Dimitrio007 | [quote]

     
     

    The eternal engine is possible, only in the future. There are theories about the existence of a certain matter in the proof of the existence of which it is possible to create an eternal (or long-working) engine that will draw energy from this matter.

    The laws of modern physics do not allow the creation of a perpetual motion machine, but perhaps in the future, scientists will be able to discover new laws.

    For example, 1000 years ago there were no telescopes with microscopes, no cars, no planes and missiles. Also now. Maybe after 10, or maybe after 100 and 1000 years, someone can still invent the Perpetual motion machine.

     
    Comments:

    # 51 wrote: Artyom | [quote]

     
     

    The perpetual permanent magnet motor, patented in 1979 in the USA, 30 years later, a dispute about the possibility of work, what kind of education are we talking about? Mammoths.

    Field strength, or flux density, is measured in Tesla, or in a Gaussian unit of measure. One tesla equals 10,000 gauss. ~ for 10 tr you can get a magnet with a tensile load of ~ 500 kg per 50 cm3, how magnets are created or excited can be found by anyone, the question of transporting 15-20 of these kids from the car will be difficult to pull out. Assemble the installation torque depends on its size, 5-6 years you have to accumulate electricity. The discharge on restoration of magnetic properties -?

    Efficiency -? Who will say that nonsense?

     
    Comments:

    # 52 wrote: Ivan Morozov | [quote]

     
     

    About perpetual motion machines. 100 years ago, people claimed that a piece of metal weighing several hundred tons would not fly, and the one who proposed the idea, and even if he just started talking about such an opportunity, was thrown over the caps of a crowd convinced that this was impossible. But what we see now. This is not surprising for us. But let's think about who told us that this is not possible. Government. Now, with one voice, many will say that this is not so. But I prepared for this too. We will see.Take a robot. After all, a robot is much easier to control. He cannot improve, he performs only those tasks that were assigned to him. He just does not need to improve.

    Just like the government claimed that a piece of iron would not fly. But for what? The answer is simple so that a person does not develop, does not strive for the best, the highest. But as they say, progress does not stand still. And the most interesting thing is that the world is changing thanks to units. But again, the catch. Not all inventions reach us. They simply do not pass the test of the scientific complex. Since many inventions are not beneficial to the economy, and many other factors of the country.

    But now we will talk about such a development as a perpetual motion machine. And again the exclamations of many dissatisfied. You say to create it is not possible. But so you say, only because you were so convinced. This information will be interesting only to those who believe in the creation of such, believe that it has already been created. And this person who believes that there is such equipment will be right. Right with a capital letter. He really is and he works.

    The perpetual motion machine is located in Switzerland. Yes, yes, there. In a community called Linden. Yes, but it’s not just a community. There is a small furniture factory. Workshops garages, etc. there is also present. The most interesting thing is that there is no electricity. You can verify this by looking at the electricity bills. Surprisingly, they are not. The entire community is provided with electricity, according to many physicists, a non-existent perpetual motion machine. The inventor of this miracle is Paul Bauman. Several dozen physicists have seen this free energy generator, and they cannot understand the essence of its work. And this generator from the seventies, true, serves the community. There are prototypes of this equipment. The name of this perpetual motion machine is Testatic. The most interesting thing is that this perpetual motion machine has been hiding for a long time. With the appearance on the Internet of photos about him, these sites mercilessly banned. Roughly speaking, they blocked oxygen to information sources. Several times the authorities tried to destroy this perpetual motion machine. Afraid that he will go to the masses.

    Let’s think what would happen if he went around the people. Why would we need state electricity. Oil and the like. All this would not be necessary. The country's economy collapsed. All billionaires would become commoners. Do you think this state is needed. Not. And that's it.

     
    Comments:

    # 53 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The perpetual motion machine does not exist and cannot exist. The scheme that is given in the article is complete nonsense. As an electrician with great experience, I can guarantee this. In the comments, the name of various “mystical perpetual motion machines” that supposedly exist, but no one has ever seen, has surfaced several times. The perpetual permanent magnet motor, Testatika from Linden, generators of Kapanadze, Gritskevich, Stepanov ... If they have been working for a long time, then why are they hiding them? Yes, having in their hands a working perpetual motion machine, its owners would immediately become billionaires. It is amazing how many people are on different bikes and trying to prove unreal things. The trouble with modern civilization is that science and mysticism are mixed in the heads of most comrades. It should be more critical of various unscientific nonsense. And if you believe everything in a row, then it will not bring to good.
    Pavel Alekhnovich

     
    Comments:

    # 54 wrote: Ivan Morozov | [quote]

     
     

    Another perpetual motion machine. The so-called perpetual motion machine from the evil one.
    It is also designed very simply, but it is more useful. To create it, it is enough to have knowledge of physics for the eighth grade (I understood this later). The creator specifically made a very simple scheme. As an example, take one magnetized element and place a second, non-magnetized element next to it. However, placing them side by side, the magnetic field of one element will pass to another. This device also works. We take two bars of iron on one and on the second we make a winding.Only the first winding we plug into the network, and connect the bulb, and put the second side by side, for clarity, we block them with a non-conductor. And we connect a light bulb to the second bar. From the second little stick, the light is on. However strange it may seem, the energy spent on just one light bulb. It turns out two bulbs for the price of one. The most interesting thing is that such a chain can be extended for a very long time. Maybe at least 100 lights are on, for the price of one. My thoughts went further. But what if, from any one bar, conduct wires to the battery. Let it charge. Now turn off the network, and let the bars be powered by the battery. He will spend as much energy as he will receive, in addition, he will power several more electrical devices, spending only one energy. It turns out a perpetual motion machine, without moving parts. And yet it has an efficiency of more than 200%, while not consuming anything. Just imagine how effective this device is. But how harmful is it to the oil industry. I do not want to blame the state. On the one hand, this is also correct. But as I said, units change the world. Perhaps it is you who will be this unit. Let's create the future together. Let's think globally. Let's learn to think.

     
    Comments:

    # 55 wrote: andy78 | [quote]

     
     

    Ivan Morozov, you need to write books, and, necessarily, science fiction. There is very little logic in your opus, but how many emotions!

     
    Comments:

    # 56 wrote: ALeXaNDeR | [quote]

     
     

    So this is a brilliant idea!
    Now I understand why my attempts to put the engine and generator on the same shaft failed.
    It was only necessary to put another generator at 6 volts. This solves all the problems associated with friction and low efficiency of generators and converters.
    Thank you very much for the brilliant idea.

    And I, in turn, will go on patenting my new development: The extension cord is included in itself.

     
    Comments:

    # 57 wrote: Misha | [quote]

     
     

    No. 54: "The perpetual motion machine of the evil one" wink Fun such a name.

    All the time I am surprised how many, as it were softer to say, not quite healthy people live among us. Just awful.

     
    Comments:

    # 58 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The engine is called "eternal" not because it should serve forever, but because it is always developed.

     
    Comments:

    # 59 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Many countries are looking for options so as not to buy gas, oil, electricity from other countries. They are actively developing and testing in this direction, they do not have a perpetual motion machine and these countries without rich natural resources have to save. They use the rotation of permanent magnet motors (such only small in any battery powered machine) from wind and water, solar panels. They want to make a pipe several kilometers in which there will be a draft that is eternal in the literal sense due to the difference in air temperature at its ends, the temperature affects the difference in atmospheric pressure which makes air move in one of the directions and rotate the blades of the same big motors inside the pipe. If you connect a light bulb to the motor and twist its rod fast enough, the light comes on, this technical miracle was previously considered impossible, this is the “perpetual motion machine” they have been used for a long time, and in a multi-kilometer pipe it will become really “eternal” until the parts wear out.

     
    Comments:

    # 60 wrote: Oleg Garifyanov | [quote]

     
     

    In short, I created a good independent power plant. It consists of 2 batteries, an inverter, a charger and a time relay. Output Power 1500W. This is enough to connect a lot of electrical appliances. 4-5 of these installations will be enough to provide the whole house or apartment in full. The advantages of compactness, cheapness and virtually no noise. I have enough and really like it. You can not depend on electricity suppliers. Almost a perpetual motion machine.Perhaps in the not too distant future when it becomes tough with energy resources, the alternative energy source invented by me will be used by everyone and I will be remembered with a good word. If you have questions write.

     
    Comments:

    # 61 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    In general, see take 2 transformers
    with different resales
    divide the current into 2 parts for each of the trans
    1m more voltage, 2m more current
    And then turn them on sequentially

    The same current flows through one conductor.
    those. the current through the piece’s conductor is constant and if we add a couple of turns of a higher-voltage coil there, it’s only a resistance since there shouldn’t be any magnetic connection between two different transformers

    And the voltage on the conductor is taken higher

    So I took 2 power supplies
    Amperage was measured for short
    and voltage - the initial voltage of these power supplies

    results

    1 power supply 0.6 Amps, 7.79 volts
    2 power supply 1.26 Amperes 12.23 volts
    connected in series
    current 2.06 Amperes, voltage 20 volts

    consider offhand power
    1 block + 2 block = 0.6 * 7.79 + 1.26 * 12.23 = 20.0838 watts
    and connected in series 2.06 * 20 = 41.2 watts

    (The first power supply was taken from an old MK calculator
    or something else from the old Soviet 7.79 volts
    The second one, which had a 12-volt power supply, was for some reason a 12-volt pulsed faucet scanner from it was powered by a faucet modem)

    The diagram drawn below is simplified.
    in order to show the general principle

    principle - "acceleration of current by voltage", folding of current and voltage when connecting a current source and voltage source in series
    it is desirable that the resistance of both of these sources is as low as possible

     
    Comments:

    # 62 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Bogdan, this is complete dick:
    1 block + 2 block = 0.6 * 7.79 + 1.26 * 12.23 = 20.0838 watts
    and connected in series 2.06 * 20 = 41.2 watts - if you do not agree, justify it !!

     
    Comments:

    # 63 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Forgot to write that in the energy amplifier uses cold electricity of Don Smith, Kapanadze, Gray and other scammers :)))

     
    Comments:

    # 64 wrote: ABS | [quote]

     
     
    Comments:

    # 65 wrote: Power engineer | [quote]

     
     

    Sashain short you are an idiot! a multi-kilometer pressure difference tube is not a perpetual motion machine! PRESSURE DIFFERENCE IS RECEIVED BY SOLAR HEATING, and this is the energy of the Sun!

     
    Comments:

    # 66 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Many examples are given from the literature of science that the creation of this is not possible. And the concept is eternal, then it should work for millions of years. Most scientists lived on debt to our time and modern technology, so they say such a sentence is excusable. But the word Eternity is an extensible concept; for a person, eternity is 100 years old. From the word Century, here we will combine the eternal age. For us now in our Age, it is enough to invent something that can work independently for 30-40 years. I will explain why 40 years. The man was born and until the age of 20 he does not live independently, he does not care where the electricity comes from. And considering the life expectancy of another 40 years, here is our Century. Especially for skeptics, everything has already been invented for us, only we need to assemble it correctly. And the article by Nikolai Kapitonov is close to the truth, but he has a lot of superfluous. And if he came to this himself (thinking), let him explain what he will do next. And I consider people who are pushing this idea to be premature, eat better and already with the program. That's all for now!

     
    Comments:

    # 67 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    ... the sun also does not last forever, but everyone would like to have such a source of energy ...

    That's right, they told you everything - move your brains, otherwise they work for humanity by 5% ...

     
    Comments:

    # 68 wrote: Dimitrio007 | [quote]

     
     

    Pavel Alekhnovich, but several hundred years ago, the same electrician (well, then there were no electricians ... say a physicist) said the same thing about a conventional engine. Man is evolving and getting smarter all the same.

     
    Comments:

    # 69 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    GendalfBravo !!!) I completely agree with you.But unfortunately, those who want to change their lives for the better are laughed ... It's like a "voice crying in the wilderness." You scream and they don’t hear you (

     
    Comments:

    # 70 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Well them! It is impossible to convince a person if he does not want to. As for the laws of physics, they need to be taught, not hunting, and how Vysotsky sings ... Churchill came up with all this in 18!
    Therefore, I propose a new perpetual motion machine - THE ETERNAL RUBLE!
    Take the ruble, put it in your pocket, pull it out - again the ruble! So to infinity - put it back and pull it out again - here it is, the eternal ruble !!!! True, if his wife finds him, then everything is the end of eternity and neither engines with generators, magnets, wires, fifth dimensions and other rubbish will help.

     
    Comments:

    # 71 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    This scheme does not work because in any case there is resistance and the generator will not be able to generate enough energy to charge the battery, the cost of the consumer and the rotation of the motor shaft. When converting from 12 volts to 220, energy is consumed for 220 volts. The mass of the displaced water is equal to the mass of the submerged body. Also in this case, the converter simply can’t just make 220 from 12 volts. Surely it was thought out by scientists several times, even if the resistance is reduced, energy is still lost. For the perpetual motion machine to be completely rid of resistance.

     
    Comments:

    # 72 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The woman of primitive society was supposedly invented by the woman of primitive society and is still using it, and the inventors embody this idea in various constructive solutions: - this is what the teacher said at school. The best working boiler was invented, made, and tested by the inventor Geron, he was the first to use the physical properties of gas to operate the boiler. He in such a way as in nature received the WIND GIFT. His invention is a fundamental component of the perpetual motion machine. After all, still at the top of the pyramid of development of those. progress costs PSU, it is needed to obtain fuel, e. energy, heat, etc.

    We were taught that the electron is a particle and it is always in motion, determine its three states, that is, the electron can carry three information. These three information should be in the visible zone, if we can determine the devices. See, these electrons, like the earth, can rotate around the imaginary axis clockwise and counterclockwise and without rotation. These electrons with the same directions of rotation can be aligned with the axes in one line, let's call it a magician. forces. their lines in nature 2. If this line closes in the form of a donut form an e. their field is also 2. A group of electrons in motion form a system. to adjust the electron flow in the directions. Here is the eternal energy, you need to find those solutions how to get them. Hint in nature should be.

     
    Comments:

    # 73 wrote: Alexander | [quote]

     
     

    These dumbasses think they are smarter than all the people who lived before them. Where does the energy come from? Maybe there is matter that can be created from nothing? Yes, this is complete nonsense! The article was written by an amateur and is supported by the same amateur who reject all the laws of physics. Indeed, a person lives more than 2000 years and did not think of it, and such clever people took and thought of connecting the Energy amplifier to the battery! Naive schoolchildren.

     
    Comments:

    # 74 wrote: | [quote]

     
     
    Comments:

    # 75 wrote: Alexander Molokov | [quote]

     
     
    Comments:

    # 76 wrote: | [quote]

     
     
    Comments:

    # 77 wrote: Alexander Molokov | [quote]

     
     

    Andryukhe: that is, all the radioactive energy received from the medium, without any loss, turns into work with an efficiency of 100%? Do you want to say this without joking even once?

     
    Comments:

    # 78 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The second beginning of the TD has a clear meaning: one cannot get directional from a chaotic movement (on a macro scale.) But this is only within the framework of Newtonian mechanics.If the electrolyte contains charged particles arising from environmental energy and a phenomenon such as the contact potential difference, then even the simplest HIT made of aluminum, graphite and water is a superunit generator. And although the superunit, against the background of the electrochemical dissolution of the cathode is a tiny fraction, but this is a fact. Sorry to ignore your questions, the answers to which, it seems to me, are obvious. On the same principles, a superunit generator of the first kind can be built in which ionization (plasma) is created due to an external energy source, the potential difference due to the electrostatic induction of plasma ions on the electrodes. There are also superunit generators operating on other principles. I hope that convinced.

     
    Comments:

    # 79 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    You honor the law of conservation of energy ...

    If he is absolute everything, so why you still alive? And not annihilated to hell with dogs into absolute nothing?

    If everything visible around you will perish overnight ...

    With the same probability it will arise again ...

    And neither insignificant% efficiency, nor other parameters of fundamental physics, they won’t help you anymore for nothing is everything.

    It’s high time to switch to quantum physics ...

    It is high time...

     
    Comments:

    # 80 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Soon everyone will see for you a new but for us long-existing source of energy! Everything ingenious is simple! Do not just realize the idea! Rake!

     
    Comments:

    # 81 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Alexander. And YOU do not be afraid, publish, most of the principles are known and workable.
    This is 1. electrogravity (EVG Studennikova)
    2. on the contact potential difference (No. 74) -all 2 genus.
    3. on electrostatic induction (Schulders tube),
    4. resonant generators are all of the first kind, by the way,
    unrecognizable distorted in Internet messages
    and therefore unworkable (about VD1roda). Ideas are in the air. And do not think that if it occurred to you, then others could not think of it.
    These are all the delusions of youth, as well as the fact that one can secure a brilliant future for this. Rather, the opposite.

     
    Comments:

    # 82 wrote: Lonchik | [quote]

     
     

    If the circuit worked, the best engineers in the world did not fight over the question of the source of energy for electric vehicles.

     
    Comments:

    # 83 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Perpetual motion machines exist, and one of the indirect confirmations is a hacker attack on the forum site x-F.A.Q.-alternative sources, where a sane info was published on how and why perpetual motion machines work. I see no other reasons for attacking a generally innocuous scientific and technical site.

     
    Comments:

    # 84 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    This is not a matter of physics, but of the psyche. Well, they believe in the perpetual motion machine, well, let it be. This is not the worst way (but you never know what people believe in without any evidence!). And so people in action, maybe, will do something good besides.

     
    Comments:

    # 85 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    There is another variant of this scheme:

    Take for example an electric motor from a vacuum cleaner (as far as I know, it has a rotation speed of up to 10-15 thousand revolutions per minute) at 220V and, say, at 1000 watts. We attach a gearbox to it (gear, belt, chain, it is not particularly important, but gear is better with such revolutions) with a decrease in the number of revolutions on the output shaft to 1.5-2 thousand rpm. At the same time, accordingly, how many times the speed dropped, the torque increased so many times. We attach a 2-3 kW generator to the output shaft with a rated power output of 1-1.5 thousand rpm, respectively (4-6 pole) single-phase.

    Voooot. Now when everything is assembled - we start the electric motor from the network, then, when everything is untwisted, we switch to the ring. All.

    Of course I understand that efficiency there and so on, but ....

    But we raised the torque, while absolutely not losing power at the same time with a loss of speed, since these revolutions are just enough for the genes.Therefore, when the motor rotates, it will be much easier for him to twist the gene, respectively, and he needs less power.

    I myself did not collect it because of the lack of genes (the old vacuum cleaner found, oddly enough))). I’ve thought up this scheme while still at school, but now my hands don’t reach, since I started assembling the gravitational engine, but who cares, try to assemble it. Of course, I can’t vouch for the result, but something interesting should come out))

    And in general, I’ve recently realized one thing: it’s not necessary to invent something to violate the laws of physics, you just need to find a way around it without violating them))

     
    Comments:

    # 86 wrote: ron | [quote]

     
     

    Yes it will not spin. The load is great. At the output of the generators there will be some kind of miserable current for a small bulb no more, it will not charge the battery. In the variants mentioned here, the coolest is about a vertical pipe. An idea worthy of an estimation of efficiency. The power seems to be low, but it should work constantly, not like any photovoltaic and windmills there - one sun needs another wind, and it seems like it's almost constant. Yes, and you can build wherever you want and in any quantity and at least maintenance.

     
    Comments:

    # 87 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Maybe it won’t, but it’s necessary to check for conscience.

     
    Comments:

    # 88 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jZNOD4BgugA

    By the way, here is my version, though the author is not me, but it works for him)))

     
    Comments:

    # 89 wrote: Dmitriy | [quote]

     
     

    yshka2004,
    the generator produces 840 watts, and the engine (rotating this generator) consumes 1.2 kW. Even if we neglect friction against bearings, heating wires and other energy costs, where else will 360W come from ??? Do not be offended, but you are a bullshit electrician ...

     
    Comments:

    # 90 wrote: power engineer | [quote]

     
     

    Lord !!!
    The eternal engine was created 200 years ago by the great Faraday and improved by the greatest Tesla to 95% efficiency, nowadays any student can come up with the design of the eternal engine))) The problem is NOT in the design, but in the imperfection of the materials-conductors, we should not think about the design features, a ABOUT CONVERSION AND TRANSFER OF ENERGY WITHOUT LOSS.

     
    Comments:

    # 91 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Oleg Garifyanov,
    Oleg tell me why you use time relay? (I do not understand electrical engineering.)

     
    Comments:

    # 92 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The eternal engine in our time is our inside, but the engine can be made of a magnet that will work longer and more powerful and without fuel these days. If there was a sponsor I could do it, but whoever believes it is sad!

    Denis bulldogs error, not denis bullaks!

     
    Comments:

    # 93 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The author is well done !!!
    Despite the fact that its VD will not work even if we take the efficiency of the component machines 100%, because the author has a misunderstanding of the work initially .... the greater the power take-off = the more energy is needed for this take-off = generator 2 is obviously overkill, but simply put, the VD given by the author cannot be considered without load. The idea itself is not new far ........ and who knows, after some time the author, having gained knowledge, will someday create his own motor-generator with an extra unit energy coefficient !!!!
    To the author = do not listen to anyone, invent and work in this direction. Inquisitiveness of the mind is the engine of progress! And the one who does nothing is not mistaken!

     
    Comments:

    # 94 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    EVERYTHING dies, goes out, cools down, flows out, ends ... because ETERNAL NO.

     
    Comments:

    # 95 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I looked at the circuit with a cursory glance and immediately saw several errors. Firstly, why use a 220 volt motor as a drive and start it through the converter. The converter has an efficiency of about 70%, and the remaining 30% of the power is lost. After all, it’s much easier to put a 12-volt permanent motor and remove this converter as unnecessary. And the second mistake is that it makes no sense to add an additional generator to the circuit, which creates additional mechanical load that needs to be rotated. Isn’t it easier for consumers to remove voltage from main 12 volt generator. And besides, the fewer parts, the more reliable the system will work.

     
    Comments:

    # 96 wrote: Mumrik | [quote]

     
     

    That's because even electricians of nichrome are not known to us in physics, that's why the country is in the ass and sits.Doctors do not know how to identify a disease, builders do not know how to choose a paint, teachers do not understand their subject, officials do not fulfill their duties ... and electricians do not know the basic principles of physics. That's why we are sitting in the ass.

     
    Comments:

    # 97 wrote: Kolyan | [quote]

     
     

    yshka2004,
    The above information about the "ETERNAL ENGINE" garbage is complete! Probably only untilREALLY ETERNAL ENGINE (for the car)!!!

     
    Comments:

    # 98 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Assuming that this design will work for a week from the battery. That is already worth it to pay attention to it. I will even say more. I’ll add more precisely. Charging should not be put on a working battery, but on an additional one. Free from support for circuit work. And then in a week the first one will sit down, and the second will replace it with the help of additional switching in the circuit. But this is provided that this work will be able to work at least a couple of days.

    I propose another scheme for discussion, the link does not go through. Therefore, type in the search engine the word delivery, on the site you will find a section of articles, and there is an article about the perpetual motion machine.

     
    Comments:

    # 99 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE WHO REALLY INVENTS THE ETERNAL ENGINE REALLY HELPING PEOPLE. IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE POOR

     
    Comments:

    # 100 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    You can take magnets, put them on a circle, and the repulsive magnet is more powerful. Let the axis go from the circle with the magnets, the belt will go to the axis, which will go to the electric generator, and preferably without the belt, so that there is less friction, the generator will do its job, the problem is that the motor will die by any means, and the circle with magnets. You will have to twist it manually, since it is difficult to find a point 100% 0. You can put a motion sensor, when it stops, it will respond and automatically supply current to the motor from an additional battery, which will bring the circle with magnets into action. It seems to me that a completely real design, the only problem is that the motor will die, but with the technologies that are available now, the motor can be made of materials that will not be washed or heated. How much such an engine will produce depends on the power and magnitude of the magnets, the more thrust the magnets have, the more you can put an electric generator. Here you have the perpetual motion machine.

     
    Comments:

    # 101 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hear all the physics of o @ uen ... In the world we live in is full of surprises, anything is possible. Remember stupid, all that humanity has come to begin with a dream. So instead of cunting about some laws, go and do your own thing. Respect to the author :) Bro, I had the same scheme, only there what do you need 220 volts for 6 volts of income ???????? I have a 10 volt engine, only it is Japanese and it has energy savings, with it it draws a 5 volt to the consumer. I haven’t been able to achieve “eternity” yet, but it has been working for 8 months already, and the energy of the battery has dropped by only 7 percent.

     
    Comments:

    # 102 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    This is not a question of technology, physics, etc. sciences. Well, a person believes that it works, well, and for health. Let him continue to believe "it is better than from vodka and from colds ..."

     
    Comments:

    # 103 wrote: MOZG | [quote]

     
     

    read somewhere. they write that in a closed system, it would not be possible to generate, as it were, an excess of energy ... well, well. It used to be that the earth was flat! we still know so little !! By the way, I found on this occasion. I plan to do according to that scheme - maybe someone already did - write off. here:
    44kw.com/blogs/handmade/2300-vechnyi-dvigatel-svoimi-rukami

     
    Comments:

    # 104 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Uhh how many komentov. People, you first decide what you mean by a perpetual motion machine. Someone wrote permanent magnets above will still be demagnetized after 80 years. And that you will keep a candle all these 80 years, it’s clear dick that parts need to be replaced from time to time with new ones. For example, a car is also not eternal, but it is also used, at least for a while, to ride, creating comfort for yourself, rather than running on 2 legs.With such words, it’s easier to immediately rope around the neck, one FIG will not live forever.

    So the essence of the perpetual motion machine is not in its perpetual rotation, but in obtaining free energy out of the blue, not to pay someone for the volume of its use.

    Permanent magnets are also a kind of energy source that is fading, just like a simple battery in your laptop. But before the magnet fades, it will take much longer, compared with what energy is required for, besides the problem is to buy new magnets. With the right design, it is possible to produce mechanical rotation of the shaft, which in turn, when connected with other low-cost elements, is converted into electricity.

    A good example of planet Earth is a kind of magnet, a river flowing down a slope creates mechanical energy, we build dams with generators which, due to the flow of water between the rotor blades of the screw connected to the generator, receive electricity. Further, the water that has leaked, and due to other properties of the planet, evaporates, rises up and again falls into that river at the beginning of the slope, it is also a kind of perpetual motion until the earth dies away.

    Of course, for home conditions, I still prefer to buy electricity without messing with an autonomous generator. But such a generator is very popular in the country, on vacation, on the train for long trips in which the sockets always do not work, but you want to sit at the laptop, etc. Well, for the house at that rare moment, if there is any accident at the CHP. You can assemble both mini generators, for charging mobile devices with you in your pocket, and large ones for household appliances, putting them in the pantry.

    There are enough rollers and schemes of various designs on YouTube to rotate the shaft with permanent magnets, so go for it.

     
    Comments:

    # 105 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I wonder if if this design is applied to a car without a 2nd generator and without fantasy for eternity, he will be able to travel more than kilometers on a single charge?

     
    Comments:

    # 106 wrote: Denis | [quote]

     
     

    And why is there a battery if, according to the author, the circuit feeds itself ????

     
    Comments:

    # 107 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello everybody! My first communication was under N66, I see that people are differently interested in this topic. In essence, everything that is published by man cannot be eternal, for a reason (human factor). But the main thing for us is cheap and safe energy. Therefore, I believe that the term (perpetual motion machine) should be replaced by (long-perpetual), humanly with a ten-year guarantee period. All disputes will disappear by themselves (only inventions will remain). Since often it is not necessary for the device to work and it is easier to turn it off, and this violates the law of eternity. Now I will answer (for what the battery). We do not yet have energy storage on a small scale, at least for the first launch. In order to live cheaply and safely, everything has already been invented, but a little of the wrong parameters. It remains to assemble correctly and we are provided with cheap energy. But industry is indispensable, and you cannot rebuild them from the bottom. 12 / 24v and an average of 2 / 3kw are enough for a person to live, and 1-2v is enough for lighting in general. In general, you can talk a lot about this topic and I'm still slow, look at the interest!

     
    Comments:

    # 108 wrote: Scientist12345 | [quote]

     
     

    What can you say about perpetual motion machines of this kind:

    A fully elastic ball dropped onto the asphalt. Then he jumped almost to the same height from where he fell - plus he transmitted the impulse to the ground. Energy has almost doubled. The ball can jump from the ground many times and each time transfer energy to it. This will work especially well in a vacuum. How do you like this model?

    Another example:

    A body with a mass of 1 kg moves diagonally. If you add its vertical speed + horizontal - the final speed will come out more than it was originally. Diagonal is a convention. And it depends on the accepted coordinates. we transform any direction of movement as a diagonal and add horizontal and vertical speeds. can be repeated countless times.

     
    Comments:

    # 109 wrote: Diogenes of Moscow | [quote]

     
     

    FUEL-FREE MAGNETIC MOTOR OF UNLIMITED POWER (manufacturing instruction)

    Every normal schoolchild who has brains and his hands "grow out of wit" can make such an engine.

    First, we wind the coreless toroidal winding (the core absorbs the magnetic field almost completely) and connect it to a direct current source.

    Inside the winding we place a “gravitapp” - a ring with radial magnetization. Gravitsappa will spin, according to the "rule of the left hand." We received a DC brushless motor (BKEDPT).

    You can make a homemade gravitappa by sticking magnetic plates to the tin can with one pole inward and wrapping them with tape. It is better, of course, to use pairs of plates (outside and inside the can) that hold each other. For an experiment with BKEDPT it is suitable.

    If the BKEDPT winding is superconducting, then the current will be undamped, and we will immediately get a “perpetual motion machine”.

    In order to switch from BKEDPT to a magnetic motor, we remove the winding and put instead of it magnetic arcs, centrally symmetrical, with the "horns" outward. The magnetic field at the bend of the arc is equivalent to the magnetic field of a segment of the toroidal winding. Ordinary horseshoe magnets are of little use - the field at the bend of the arc is extremely weak. To strengthen it, it is necessary to reduce the thickness (so that more lines of force come out) and increase the height (to increase the area of ​​interaction with the rotor gravitsappa). Naturally, we close the "horns" of the arcs with a magneto-anchor to completely neutralize the antifield.

    The farther away from the rotor gravitappa the "horns" of magnetic arcs are removed, the greater are the deviations from stupid formulas from stupid textbooks that do not take into account either the low speed of amers (ether particles) in a magnetic field, or the ultrafast attenuation of the field with increasing distance (at distances of tens of centimeters about stupid formulas you can "give a damn and forget"!).

    QUESTION: to hell with a horseradish winding, if it is removed ???

    ANSWER: to understand the principle of operation of the magnetic rotator.

    The late inventor Yevgeny Kormov considered that with a rotor gravitappa diameter of 100 millimeters, power up to 10 kilowatts could be obtained. Since the dependence is quadratic, with a rotor diameter of more than a meter, we can get Megawatts !!! Unless, of course, to manufacture a magnetic rotator in the factory using high-quality magnets and obtaining a uniform magnetic field.

    If the states were not controlled by asshole assholes infected with the "Jew's virus" (thirst for profit), then mass production of magnetic motors, portable magnetoelectric power stations, and the construction of a space elevator between the Earth and the Moon (to create an anti-asteroid safety system) could be started long ago. If the "Academy of Sciences" were not a bunch of moronic idiots, it would have been possible for a long time to throw out the crazy Einstein's "theory" in the trash and do magneto-energetics. If the Soviet people weren’t a crowd of moronic cowardly shrimps shaking for their own skin, then mass repressions, the famine of 1932-1934, the systematic destruction of WWII veterans who lost their arms, legs, turned into “stumps” into "samovars" (they were rotted in concentration camps), other crimes of the capeses' elite, the collapse of the USSR and the restoration of capitalism would hardly have been possible ...

    With the most profound (through) respect and best wishes !!! Diogenes of Moscow, globencisimus-christ, mebel from Mebsuta

     
    Comments:

    # 110 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Do not pay attention to criticism. Most of them. Only this majority uses devices that were previously considered delusional. I doubt that they will be able to breed fire without matches at the right time! I would be happy to chat with the author in personal correspondence. And he would throw a couple of ideas. Information for everyone: incidentally, electricity is also an accidental invention ...and people who are inquisitive and informally thinking not according to the school pattern of one. It’s not your fault, they just made you like that ...

     
    Comments:

    # 111 wrote: marikFCDK | [quote]

     
     

    Does the perpetual motion machine still exist? An interesting article, the author is well done!

     
    Comments:

    # 112 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    What do you think is the efficiency of a turbine of a hydroelectric power station, which is spinning by itself, and what is more, the load pulls?

    Not an abstract efficiency with respect to the hypothetical "full power" of the water flow passing through it, but a real efficiency of the ratio of the total generated power to that which is necessary so that the turbine does not stop at idle without load.

    If you do not see an external energy source such as a reservoir, this does not mean that it does not exist. In nature, there are many superunit processes, starting with the growth and development of any living organism, fueled from outside.

     
    Comments:

    # 113 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    There is nothing eternal in the world, the universe will ever cool down, all these devices are called, more precisely, fuel-free engines. To collect this, you need to take a fresh look at physics. Compare the two welding transformers low-frequency and high-frequency for the first efficiency of 30%, and for the second 90%, as they understand, then it is possible to increase the efficiency above 100%. The first trance weighs 30 kilograms, and the second 200 grams, and a current of 100 amperes give both. The first from the network consumes 25 amperes, and the second 8 amperes. Conclusion: with increasing voltage and current frequency, the resistance of matter decreases, that is, the microwave resistance of the coil decreases and the inductive resistance of the core, which leads to a decrease in eddy currents and losses, the Tesla transformer is a device that can be powered by feedback, which will support self-generation.

     
    Comments:

    # 114 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Those who think vividly have interesting thoughts. But the general tone, unfortunately, so far is: “Listen, be silent, for you are stupid, and I, so be it, will enlighten you, for verily, I am your God, ultimately wise, and even irrevocably wise ...” However, I would like to warn experts in this area, - "And if there is a dead end ahead?" After all, rear speed is also needed, otherwise we will remain a dead end branch of Life. To begin with, we start with polite communication - without culture, all inventions of the Mind become weapons, destroying ultimately the inventors themselves, their civilization and the planet, if they do not seek help in coordination, to the Higher levels of the Collective Mind. In short, let's live together ... However, the night is in the yard. Till...

     
    Comments:

    # 115 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Recently I read that it is necessary to make a perpetual motion machine on idiocy! But as? The handle is taken to it the generator is attached; all this is hung on the wall and next to the poster - do not twist.
    Believe me - it will work forever !!!!

     
    Comments:

    # 116 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    COMMENTS 56 AND 115 I READ WITH PLEASURE - BIG! ELECTRICIAN HIMSELF S1978, MET YOUNG PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW THE LAW OF OHM EVEN AFTER EDUCATION IN COLLEGE! HERE AND DEMIS RUSSOS DIED, AND HUNDREDS OF MIKHAIL'S STACES ARE EQUILIBLE TO HIM? AND DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME - MANY HONOR TO THE AUTHOR. BUT IF MATTER, ENERGY AND THE UNIVERSE ARE ETERNAL AND ENDLESS, THEN IT CAN BE. NEED TO LOOK FOR IT!

     
    Comments:

    # 117 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Everything is genetic, simple. The perpetual motion machine can be made and the answer can and looks ridiculously ridiculous, and therefore they do not take it into account)))

     
    Comments:

    # 118 wrote: Anatoly | [quote]

     
     

    Are the electrons around the nucleus not eternity? The question is how to get them to do useful work.

     
    Comments:

    # 119 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I had enough for the first 50 comments and a little at the end))
    Well, I’m sure that they will still discover the unknown forms of field, energy, or even matter. They may even learn to convert these sources into electricity, but VD in its pure form is impossible. Any engine is no more eternal than the Universe itself, and is only a link in the chain of constant transformations occurring in it.

     
    Comments:

    # 120 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Dimon,
    WELL PLANETS THEN FLY IN ORBIT ...

     
    Comments:

    # 121 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I read the article, comments, all the pros and cons. I read it very patiently ...
    And now I would like for someone to collect and to shoot on video. I have neither the time nor the technical ability. If all the comrades who will collect and show FOR, then you can believe it, and so I have already discussed this topic more than once and, in short, I do not believe it. Show that it works, as well as push into the mortar.

     
    Comments:

    # 122 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Guys, I read all the comments, and I want to tell you that nothing is impossible, perpetual motion machines can be assembled from anything, if you choose the right material. As Tesla said, We are like a spoon of fresh water at the bottom of the ocean, so that energy can be extracted from vacuum (ether), gravity, resonance, light, nuclear, chemical, etc. you only need to create a mechanism that will be able to extract it from the one you need above, and to create something eternal alone is unlikely to happen, to be honest, we now, like Stork, Cancer, and Pike, pull in 3 different directions for a treasure bag, if someone really wants to create something, then we all need to unite and act together and together, and then something happens, as our brain said above, only 5% works, and if more brains come together, then we will already think and think like a full-fledged computer (figuratively speaking). So I will be glad to get to know all of you to help realize for some DREAM in reality, I’m lying around at home idleI will be happy with your letters.

     
    Comments:

    # 123 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello everybody. We need a controller from solar panels with the ability to control on and off emergency light. In the place of emergency light on relay 12V. The relay includes an engine speed control circuit. Lead engine for 220 V or 12V. Which turns the generator. The generator charges the battery. And already from 12 to 220, the converter and the consumer. Eternal or not. Sooner or later, the battery will die. The application can not do. Just do it for yourself.

     
    Comments:

    # 124 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    There are people with a backpack. Chel-60kg / not very well-fed. in a backpack 10 kg. It goes 5 km and does the work = path x force. It takes about an hour ...

    They put him on a bike without a backpack, but the bike also weighs 10 kg.

    That person drove the same 5 km, but in half an hour. The work is the same, and the time to complete the same work is half as much ...

    The thing in power is stated by physics when work = power x time.

    It turns out people on a bicycle 2 times more powerful than a chela-pedestrian ...

    We must try to dig potatoes on a bicycle .. According to science, it will be 2 times faster.

     
    Comments:

    # 125 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The Raider Finsrud machine is an in-line perpetual motion machine. Who cares about Google. And then .... Magnets will be demagnetized and that’s it. But this is sooooo long time.

     
    Comments:

    # 126 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    And I just made it simpler - the 28v 1kw Generator with self-excitation is driven through the timing belt, from the Bulgarian gearbox which is connected through a cardan to the 12v 6000 rpm engine. At the expense of the dpt reducer, it does not experience loads, and quietly twists the gene both under load and without it. In connection with the gear ratio of the gear pulleys (large on the gene, small on the gearbox) the gene spins half the force and calmly gives out 15-17v, recharging the battery and helping the dpt spin. Further inverter 12/220 and voila. There is a battery charge controller like on windmills, which then turns on the drive then turns off ......

     
    Comments:

    # 127 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Hello everyone! I was noted twice in this discussion 66 and 107. Now I want to deviate from the main topic and talk with people like 126 - Roman. Dear designer, why are you all, finding a good voltage in low volts, try to get 220 volts. This error occurs when the Solar and Wind power receivers work. Having accumulated a lot of energy in a low voltage, when converted to 220 volts, a large percentage is lost, but why! For human life and activity, 12/24 volts is enough (the better or brighter the light bulb is 220v at 100W, than 12 / 24v at 100W). This is no longer necessary to prove, just go to the store - there is light, equipment, almost everything is there. There are only refrigerators left, but refrigerators now consume very little - well, let them work at 220. And on the account of the VD, I set forth my thoughts.

     
    Comments:

    # 128 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Nikolay, dear, and where are you going to take a dear boiler with 24v automation ?, and circulation pumps for heating? And the 12-volt engines that filter my pool every 2 hours? And much more ... If you live in an apartment on the couch, developing the course of world theory, then the course of your thoughts is understandable. And so build a house, start an economy that also needs light and heat, that's where you sing about windmills and the like .... I don’t have gas and everything is on electricity, like so many others .... and my hands are not priests grow, hence the desire to somehow make life cheaper ....

    Alexander Molokov,
    The law of conservation of energy has not been thought up and has not been studied, and therefore appeared as such with someone else's filing, as well as the theory of relativity, Mikola Tesla put many laws in the ass and would have put it if it had not died.

    And the ant lifts the weight 10 times more than its own, which means it has an efficiency of 500%, and the elephant lifts only 20% of its weight .... so healthy and the efficiency is 0 and the tenth horseradish, so think about where your school physics is ... .

     
    Comments:

    # 129 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    And what did they say about the gravitsapu? How to make it more powerful?

     
    Comments:

    # 130 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Kolya Kolya, where are you?

     
    Comments:

    # 131 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    His perpetual motion machine does not start. Candles flooded ..

     
    Comments:

    # 132 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Kolya is a perpetual motion machine, he disappeared forever .......

     
    Comments:

    # 133 wrote: Jacob Pritzker | [quote]

     
     

    Brothers, the only sources of energy are torsion fields. The current academicians Shipov and Akimov are engaged in them (I do not remember everyone). All the rest is bullshit, if it were worthwhile - in the Soviet Union they would have long been engaged in this.

     
    Comments:

    # 134 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Novel. I rarely go here, it doesn’t interest me much. Why are you all chasing after automation - sooner or later, it will fail. The most reliable is reliable toggle switches, as long as you need to turn it on, but not need to turn it off. If in villages the stoves are not too lazy to heat, then clicking is like automation. And for such heating tena is better to do low power - I have 300 watts. I made a special order in Voronezh, they later made a boiler for heating in 3 kW. So, do not be discouraged, everything will come to you someday. In Russia, we love and wait for everything to be done in China. And let the light into the stable under the light of 4 volts burn well. Take the charger from any phone and you can catch a few light bulbs from the flashlight (street lighting), even the meter does not see them - it does not shake.

     
    Comments:

    # 135 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    It's funny A man seems to have built a perpetual motion machine, but is worried about the meter reading. Someone is lying somewhere :)

     
    Comments:

    # 136 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Are you people confused in two dimensions? Unlike the author of the article, I do not seek any recognition in the world of science. My goal is to make an alternative to a wind generator, so that the wind is not always there, and the lights are turned off, just when there is no such wind. My installation is under the roof, protected from rains, frost, etc. there are no losses in the wires, and will not fly anywhere during a hurricane. NIKOLAI - what are the 300W watts ???? Are you using them to heat a doghouse ?? And then the light in the stable at 4 volts ??? Have you calculated the cost of the LEDs and the wiring for them? With my installation, I feed asynchronous engines that work constantly, especially in winter, because I have two solid fuel boilers - one for a 200kW house, the second for a bath with a pool, you and your heating fan will fly into such a pipe, which is scary to think. And I gathered this thing from the fact that it’s lying around under my feet, it didn’t cost me anything and will pay off instantly, well, plus there is a very tangible energy saving, which becomes more and more expensive
    Anyway, it’s very interesting to do something with your own hands, so that it also works and brings benefits. But you do not need to buy a lot of brains of brains.

    Yes, in general, the author of the article will forgive me, this is not a perpetual motion machine, just like my design.
    This is an alternative energy source, the most simplified, and cheaper to manufacture, but quite effective.
    Somehow it will still require maintenance, replacement of batteries, bearings, etc. However, this is nothing compared to its performance and self-satisfaction .... Neighbors with electricity buckets are already coming to me :)

    People count to Nikolay how much he can hang light bulbs on a 400mA 5 volt battery charger from the phone, plus wire resistance. And then I have a calculator, it burned out.
    There is a better offer, a Chinese flashlight on your head --- and all the same, wherever you look, there is light. It’s not for you to run with the ten in the corners.

     
    Comments:

    # 137 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Are there people who sponsor a perpetual motion machine with free electricity? I have such a technology. I will work with a large company or a very rich person!

     
    Comments:

    # 138 wrote: Tesla | [quote]

     
     

    The motor automatically, which will power the circle, from a small battery of tablets feed the city).

     
    Comments:

    # 139 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    You have nothing, Edward, no "technology." Not even money.

     
    Comments:

    # 140 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    Do not listen to anyone. The perpetual motion machine is possible. Energy in itself is a thing that has not been studied, and besides, I have a different, more understandable and real explanation of motion. I generally have 2 options for perpetual motion.

    1st.

    To wheel, screw, etc. or attach a stick to the generator, and attach blades to the stick. To attach magnets to the blades on one side, with one pole, parallel to them, put magnets with the same pole not on the blades, strong enough to not interfere with the rotation of the blades. Further, he will spin. The main thing is without iron. Steel never loses its magnetic properties, so it can be used, and so that the engine does not collapse, pump gases.

    2nd.

    An electric pump is brought to the wind farm to blow on the blades. Lead a wire from the generator to the pump at the wind station. He will power the pump. Not all electricity will go out of the generator to move the blades, part will go to human consumption.

    By the way, the pump can be made without consumption at all, then the 3rd version of the engine is possible.

    3rd.

    The blades are made with a slope, with magnets on one side of the blades, with one pole, next to each other, magnets are placed with the same pole so that they repel and nothing prevents the blades from spinning. All this should be in the tank. As a result, air will flow where a person needs it.

    Whoever will offend colleagues will deal with such a thermonuclear bomb.

    Explosives are attached to the body of the bomb, and it is also in the center. Between layers of deuterium explosives. A fuse is attached below, between the body and the explosive there is oxygen, near the fuse there is silicon, and the fuse itself is made of silicon.

    When the fuse moves (the friction of silicon against flint), a spark is formed that ignites the explosive, which causes such a pressure that is sufficient for thermonuclear reactions, TPs occur and an explosion occurs. The hull is already destroyed, so the spread will not slow anything down and the explosion will be stronger.

    Everything is possible in the world. I myself found the basics of a time machine and a teleportator.

    Kohl, as I understood the documents for a patent at FGU FIPS.

    In general, the following is not taken into account in efficiency. The action can be not only from the main source of work, but also from the external environment, increased pressure from below by external sources can be very strong and greatly increase useful work, and if the pressure is strong from above, it will simply interfere with the action, resulting in useful work will be less. If there is a very strong pressure from below, then the efficiency will be more than 100%.

    While commenting, check all existing theories yourself, I myself have found so many nuances in modern science that I can receive the Nobel Prize for several years in a row.

    Comment on my theory now.

     
    Comments:

    # 141 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    Here is Capitanov’s advanced perpetual motion machine that will work.

    A battery is taken, an amplifier is connected to it, then after the wires. Next are 2 wires, one connected to the battery, the other to the consumer. The battery will be recharged every time and not stop working.

     
    Comments:

    # 142 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    The battery is superfluous in this circuit. You just need to connect the amplifier output to the input. All surplus is to the consumer.

     
    Comments:

    # 143 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    To start the amplifier, you need to connect a current source to it. And so that he will strengthen.

    This is for most readers. You are absolutely sure that there is energy. This whole movement can be explained differently. The world consists of the same tiny particles. When colliding with each other, they will not decay. And if we accept that the collision of these particles changes the direction or speed of one or both particles, then the mysterious force moving the body is not needed.

    At the expense of gravitational engines, this is complete nonsense. Even if gravity is not gravity. Not when I did not think why helicopters rise. The air on Earth does not allow squeezing simply not an empty space. Not empty because the light from the stars would pass completely, etc. also passed. And the particles in space also do not stand still (the temperature would be less than absolute zero (if an atom stops, this does not mean that the particles inside it do not stop, they just slow down very much)). These particles simply redirect particles from the planet (or body) and they push other bodies (on the surface of a large body, the part simply stops, and the part rises with a slowdown, and particles from the large body are not allowed to squeeze particles from the atmosphere and lift the body on the big body) with a big body. For a body that has risen up, it’s just not immediately that all particles slow down, so you can jump, and on an airplane or rocket, the action of the engine does not allow the particles to redirect to the aircraft and it moves forward.

     
    Comments:

    # 144 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    What will it strengthen? Yes elementary, Watson! To start the amplifier, start external voltage for a second from any source, and then it will feed itself forever. And do not need this battery, uselessly consuming energy. It will turn out cheaper and more reliable.

    You can, for example, start the amplifier from the same battery. And when the amplifier starts up, remove the battery. He is no longer needed, right? So why is it pointless to charge and spend energy on it?

     
    Comments:

    # 145 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Where there is a battery, it is no longer a perpetual motion machine.

     
    Comments:

    # 146 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    Without a battery, you won’t be able to upload a video on YouTube to show how the engine "works." That's what he needs :)

     
    Comments:

    # 147 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    The battery itself will then amplify. When a current arrives at it, it will still hold part of the early charge and the charge will accumulate strongly, from which more current will flow (the charge should be the same every time in all places, therefore, to equalize the charge, it will be necessary to give more) will increase more and the consumer will get more, you just need to give a little more to the battery, the excess will still remain.

    I do not upload videos to YouTube. And look at all the engine and the rest of mine, and not just 1 perpetual motion machine

    The amplifier also consumes and in this case, how much they consume can be equal to .№144, and read on. Ate?

     
    Comments:

    # 148 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    All the "inventors" of the perpetual motion machine are balabolaty like wound up, but no one has ever done anything real. Nothing. Even if you offer them a million in cash in exchange for a working sample. Working in real life, not on YouTube :) You can’t deceive physics.

     
    Comments:

    # 149 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    You want to check it yourself, you also need to be able to read (No. 143, 2, 3 paragraph), especially in physics there are many gaps and theories that become absurd with logic. In many theories, it is not even taken into account that the Earth rotates and moves, and yet the laws in space were based on earthly ones. And 2 times I repeat, I don’t post videos on YouTube, and modern physics is basically anything at the top.

     
    Comments:

    # 150 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    Well, do at least something. Well, at least some mock-up on sticks, cords and magnets .. I’ll pay you a million for it, if you can show in real life that it works. But no, it will not :)

     
    Comments:

    # 151 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    Judging by the law of conservation of energy, a perpetual motion machine is possible. After all, energy is not lost anywhere.

    Magnets with time, even permanent ones, lose their charge, but if the constants are slightly energized by electricity, then they can remain so forever. And the perpetual motion machine can be placed in a container with inert gas, nothing will go away, even insulation on the conductor is not required, which moves away from the engine.

    Well, with science, too, changed, applied the rotation of the Earth.

    Igor, I can’t send you a video now, things will not be in my favor, in silence I want to live, and I’ll not believe my age

     
    Comments:

    # 152 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    Clear. As it came to "do-it-yourself", so the forum stalled.
    Hey, talkative, do you have hands, or just tongues?

     
    Comments:

    # 153 wrote: Vitaly Alekseev | [quote]

     
     

    Igor, we have a mind, not languages, but you can make a thermonuclear bomb if you have the materials.

     
    Comments:

    # 154 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    We read the title.
    If there is a mind, there is a language, but no hands - pass by :)

     
    Comments:

    # 155 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    The claimed scheme, of course, is not suitable for the role of a perpetual motion machine. On each section of the circuit there is energy loss ... But this has already been said.

    I would like to draw the attention of many critics not only of this scheme, but, in general, of this topic. They learned from school that the perpetual motion machine is one that will work forever. Who can check and when? The universe itself is not eternal ...

    It is high time to classify the invention of machines with an efficiency above 100% as the “Eternal Engine”. And not necessarily the law of conservation of energy should be violated. Do we know everything about the environment, about the types of energy, about the fields?

    Developing this topic, I thought: is the "Eternal Engine" necessary, is the efficiency of 100% and more% mandatory ??

    What desire drives us? Autonomous engine, as cheap as possible in operation, without constant recharge of external energy, for which you have to pay!

    For example, a windmill is almost consistent with these desires, it does not matter that the efficiency of converting wind power into electricity is less than 100% - so far no taxes are required for the wind. But the wind itself, like a windy woman ...

    The point is to create an autonomous engine working with an efficiency of even less than 100%, but on a constant and inexhaustible source of energy (torsion, magnetic, electronic fields, etc.). Those. a source of energy that we don’t need to extract from sweat (current gas, oil, etc.).

     
    Comments:

    # 156 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    Quote: Oleg
    They learned from school that the perpetual motion machine is one that will work forever.

    Absolutely wrong. Those who did not skip physics at school know the strict physical definition of perpetual motion machines (perpetual motion machines are two varieties, by the way). About his eternal work there is not a word :)
    Therefore, before you write something on this topic, finally read the definition of its perpetual motion machine from the textbook! This is not the engine at all, in which the bearings do not wear out or the magnets do not demagnetize, hehe :)

     
    Comments:

    # 157 wrote: Igor | [quote]

     
     

    The fourth is too early :)
    Physics at school in the 7th grade begin to teach. And until the 11th. So "medicine" begins after school, and before that - basic illiteracy.

    The fourth is too early :)
    Physics at school in the 7th grade begin to teach. And until the 11th.So "medicine" begins after school, and before that - basic illiteracy.

     
    Comments:

    # 158 wrote: Venene | [quote]

     
     

    Nikk,
    I read that you here scribbled one here about the efficiency of the Toldych off-topic, the second troll of the author of the idea of ​​the perpetual motion machine knocks everyone off. the one who described a similar circuit to batteries was not noticed at all. SO HERE !!! This is not about a perpetual motion machine, but about an autonomous type of power source from the Accumulator which is an Accumulator of either 12 or 24v, for example, a transformer from 12 or 24v to 220v. 1 generator charging per Akum., The generator itself gives out 12 or 24v depending on Akum. thereby constantly charging so that the capacity does not end (the amendment does not need to be constantly charged and through the auto-charging unit, otherwise Akum will rip up or even explode) 2 generator from its inherent parameters for power supply. 2 generators will increase resistance under load, so you need to take into account the speed of rotation of the shaft from the electric motor by selection, because the electric motor itself will consume a lot of energy because of its power, you need a gearbox to increase the frequency of rotation, so your efficiency is arbitrary. This scheme will work without additional loads, and if you need to connect an electric kettle or a saw, then the system needs to be improved.

     
    Comments:

    # 159 wrote: Shatak | [quote]

     
     

    Commentators guys! You are just couch experts no more. I am sure that none of you even tried to do something like that. With your herd mentality, just sit on the couch and don’t put on those who act. You seem to shine here with some knowledge in physics, but this knowledge is still at the level of the ninth grade at school. Read more scientific papers, conduct experiments, break the standards, then the laws of physics will break. Now live with it)))

     
    Comments:

    # 160 wrote: Anatoly | [quote]

     
     

    If a person after the fourth grade continues to invent the perpetual motion machine, then this is not physics, here pure medicine.

     
    Comments:

    # 161 wrote: nice169y@yahoo.com | [quote]

     
     

    It’s like the majority from another cell — Inferno-Trolls, part of the epiphysis is not grown toli of another breed ...
    Miha- I want to talk a couple of questions about the removal / fight against emf
    sign off pliz ?! In the cons we vaasche physics was not.
    Oleg Guryanov - bravo! Dear but lightly noise-free!
    Ready to purchase lifePo4 48v50
    I'm waiting

     
    Comments:

    # 162 wrote: Yuri Makarenko | [quote]

     
     

    No one bothered to read the secret application to this design? In reality, there are two batteries in the circuit, while one is working, the second is being recharged from the network by a freelance charger !!)))

     
    Comments:

    # 163 wrote: Novel | [quote]

     
     

    Hello. Tell me please. I'm not good at it. But generally understandable. I have my own idea, similar. For example, take a drill for 220 connected to the akamulyator through a 220v converter, and spin up an asynchronous generator, for example, it will give out 300v. And then turn off the converter, and connect the generator to the drill directly. Question. Will this work? And if so, will it remain 80v? Sorry for the spelling mistakes.

     
    Comments:

    # 164 wrote: Born in the USSR | [quote]

     
     

    This is the question Western education leads to.

     
    Comments:

    # 165 wrote: Nikolay | [quote]

     
     

    Not bad, very bad: nevertheless, there are still sane people who have studied physics at school.

    And to the illiterate trolls who admire captain's delirium, I wish to translate this delirium into metal. Just do not forget that under the battery necessarily it’s necessary to put a philosopher’s stone, it won’t work without it. ;)